These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27285061)

  • 21. Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography.
    Yoon JW; Lee ES; Park HJ; Park SB; Cho YY; Kannengiesser S; Hur J
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Jul; 28(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 35950274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.
    Co M; Dong H; Boulter DJ; Nguyen XV; Khan SN; Raterman B; Klamer B; Kolipaka A; Walter BA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 35289470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Liver MR Elastography at 3 T: Agreement Across Pulse Sequences and Effect of Liver R2* on Image Quality.
    Felker ER; Choi KS; Sung K; Wu HH; Raman SS; Bolster BD; Kannengiesser S; Sorge K; Lu DSK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):588-594. PubMed ID: 29995500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.
    Ito D; Numano T; Ueki T; Habe T; Maeno T; Takamoto K; Igarashi K; Maharjan S; Mizuhara K; Nishijo H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 71():27-36. PubMed ID: 32325234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.
    Cunha GM; Glaser KJ; Bergman A; Luz RP; de Figueiredo EH; Lobo Lopes FPP
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20180126. PubMed ID: 29718694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.
    Morisaka H; Motosugi U; Glaser KJ; Ichikawa S; Ehman RL; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Onishi H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 27662640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Free-breathing radial magnetic resonance elastography of the liver in children at 3 T: a pilot study.
    Kafali SG; Armstrong T; Shih SF; Kim GJ; Holtrop JL; Venick RS; Ghahremani S; Bolster BD; Hillenbrand CM; Calkins KL; Wu HH
    Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jun; 52(7):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 35366073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Reproducibility of MR Elastography Measurements of the Lumbar Back Muscles.
    Chevalier B; Bedretdinova D; Pellot-Barakat C; Maître X; Creze M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Sep; 60(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 38100302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim DW; Kim SY; Yoon HM; Kim KW; Byun JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 31456328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic Performance of MR Elastography and Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography in the Detection of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Severe to Morbid Obesity.
    Chen J; Yin M; Talwalkar JA; Oudry J; Glaser KJ; Smyrk TC; Miette V; Sandrin L; Ehman RL
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):418-428. PubMed ID: 27861111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MR elastography in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease at 1.5T: Intraindividual comparison of gradient-recalled echo versus spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences and investigation of potential confounding factors.
    Plaikner M; Kremser C; Zoller H; Kannengiesser S; Henninger B
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109898. PubMed ID: 34388628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.
    Choi SL; Lee ES; Ko A; Park HJ; Park SB; Choi BI; Cho YY; Kannengiesser S
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1730-1737. PubMed ID: 31728687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between Gradient-Echo and Spin-Echo EPI MR Elastography at 3 T in quantifying liver stiffness of patients with and without iron overload; a prospective study.
    Hazhirkarzar B; Wu Q; Tang H; Baghdadi A; Motaghi M; Habibabadi RR; Shaghaghi M; Ghadimi M; Borhani A; Mohseni A; Pan L; BolsterJr BD; Kamel IR
    Clin Imaging; 2023 Aug; 100():42-47. PubMed ID: 37196504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner.
    Abe R; Fukuzawa K; Yoshihara C; Tano M; Saitoh S
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Mar; 49(3):694-702. PubMed ID: 38012395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Normal Liver Stiffness Measured with MR Elastography in Children.
    Trout AT; Anupindi SA; Gee MS; Khanna G; Xanthakos SA; Serai SD; Baikpour M; Calle-Toro JS; Ozturk A; Zhang B; Dillman JR
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):663-669. PubMed ID: 32960728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shear wave elastography for liver stiffness measurement in clinical sonographic examinations: evaluation of intraobserver reproducibility, technical failure, and unreliable stiffness measurements.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Mar; 33(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 24567455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated CNN-Based Analysis Versus Manual Analysis for MR Elastography in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Intermethod Agreement and Fibrosis Stage Discriminative Performance.
    Cunha GM; Delgado TI; Middleton MS; Liew S; Henderson WC; Batakis D; Wang K; Loomba R; Huss RS; Myers RP; Sirlin CB; Fowler KJ; Hasenstab KA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Aug; 219(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 35107306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of MR-based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same-day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects.
    Artz NS; Haufe WM; Hooker CA; Hamilton G; Wolfson T; Campos GM; Gamst AC; Schwimmer JB; Sirlin CB; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 25620624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of 2 Liver 2-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastographic Techniques in the Fasting and Postprandial States.
    Simkin P; Rattansingh A; Liu K; Hudson JM; Atri M; Jang HJ; Kim TK; Khalili K
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1739-1745. PubMed ID: 30536401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.