256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27285941)
1. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment.
Kebreab E; Liedke A; Caro D; Deimling S; Binder M; Finkbeiner M
J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2664-81. PubMed ID: 27285941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment.
Leinonen I; Williams AG
J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Dec; 95(15):3041-6. PubMed ID: 25857285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental impact of replacing soybean meal with rapeseed meal in diets of finishing pigs.
van Zanten HH; Bikker P; Mollenhorst H; Meerburg BG; de Boer IJ
Animal; 2015 Nov; 9(11):1866-74. PubMed ID: 26234347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production.
Andretta I; Hauschild L; Kipper M; Pires PGS; Pomar C
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1990-1998. PubMed ID: 29198226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consequences of the ban of by-products from terrestrial animals in livestock feeding in Germany and the European Union: alternatives, nutrient and energy cycles, plant production, and economic aspects.
Rodehutscord M; Abel HJ; Friedt W; Wenk C; Flachowsky G; Ahlgrimm HJ; Johnke B; Kühl R; Breves G
Arch Tierernahr; 2002 Apr; 56(2):67-91. PubMed ID: 12389223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amino Acid Supplementation to Reduce Environmental Impacts of Broiler and Pig Production: A Review.
Cappelaere L; Le Cour Grandmaison J; Martin N; Lambert W
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689259. PubMed ID: 34381834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs.
Hickmann FMW; Andretta I; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Remus A; Galli GM; Vittori J; Kipper M
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():732253. PubMed ID: 34708101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Protease Addition and Replacement of Soybean Meal by Corn Gluten Meal on the Growth of Broilers and on the Environmental Performances of a Broiler Production System in Greece.
Giannenas I; Bonos E; Anestis V; Filioussis G; Papanastasiou DK; Bartzanas T; Papaioannou N; Tzora A; Skoufos I
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169511. PubMed ID: 28046072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of changing toward higher welfare broiler production systems on greenhouse gas emissions: a Dutch case study using life cycle assessment.
Mostert PF; Bos AP; van Harn J; de Jong IC
Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102151. PubMed ID: 36279609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment.
Mosnier E; van der Werf HM; Boissy J; Dourmad JY
Animal; 2011 Dec; 5(12):1972-83. PubMed ID: 22440474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(10):1860-74. PubMed ID: 26987378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonsolar energy use and one-hundred-year global warming potential of Iowa swine feedstuffs and feeding strategies.
Lammers PJ; Kenealy MD; Kliebenstein JB; Harmon JD; Helmers MJ; Honeyman MS
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):1204-12. PubMed ID: 19966156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment.
Monteiro AN; Garcia-Launay F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY
J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4832-4847. PubMed ID: 27898927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in environmental impacts of Brazilian soybean according to crop production and transport scenarios.
da Silva VP; van der Werf HM; Spies A; Soares SR
J Environ Manage; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1831-9. PubMed ID: 20452717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of maize-based feed products for animal farming in Thailand.
Moungsree S; Neamhom T; Polprasert S; Suwannahong K; Polprasert C; Patthanaissaranukool W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(2):2657-2670. PubMed ID: 38066284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.
Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Armentano LE; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Norman JM; Larson R
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1571-92. PubMed ID: 25597974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
