256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27285941)
21. Effect of microbial phytase on phytate P degradation and apparent digestibility of total P and Ca throughout the gastrointestinal tract of the growing pig.
Rutherfurd SM; Chung TK; Moughan PJ
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jan; 92(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 24243891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Supplementation of broiler diets with high levels of microbial protease and phytase enables partial replacement of commercial soybean meal with raw, full-fat soybean.
Erdaw MM; Perez-Maldonado RA; Iji PA
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2018 Jun; 102(3):755-768. PubMed ID: 29473221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Meeting Global Feed Protein Demand: Challenge, Opportunity, and Strategy.
Kim SW; Less JF; Wang L; Yan T; Kiron V; Kaushik SJ; Lei XG
Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2019 Feb; 7():221-243. PubMed ID: 30418803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment.
Dourmad JY; Ryschawy J; Trousson T; Bonneau M; Gonzàlez J; Houwers HW; Hviid M; Zimmer C; Nguyen TL; Morgensen L
Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):2027-37. PubMed ID: 25170767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems.
Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):8-25. PubMed ID: 22184424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions.
Sasu-Boakye Y; Cederberg C; Wirsenius S
Animal; 2014 Aug; 8(8):1339-48. PubMed ID: 26263191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of environment impacts of egg production chain using life cycle assessment.
Ghasempour A; Ahmadi E
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):980-987. PubMed ID: 27692537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nutrient-derived environmental impacts in Chinese agriculture during 1978-2015.
Wu H; Wang S; Gao L; Zhang L; Yuan Z; Fan T; Wei K; Huang L
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():762-774. PubMed ID: 29656257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Life cycle energy use, costs, and greenhouse gas emission of broiler farms in different production systems in Iran-a case study of Alborz province.
Pishgar-Komleh SH; Akram A; Keyhani A; van Zelm R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jul; 24(19):16041-16049. PubMed ID: 28537021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.
Bacenetti J; Bava L; Zucali M; Lovarelli D; Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Fiala M
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():450-459. PubMed ID: 26383852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.
Soleimani T; Hermesch S; Gilbert H
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33587146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of welfare-enhancing system changes on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production.
Leinonen I; Williams AG; Kyriazakis I
Poult Sci; 2014 Feb; 93(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 24570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digestibility marker and ileal amino acid digestibility in phytase-supplemented soybean or canola meals for growing pigs.
Favero A; Ragland D; Vieira SL; Owusu-Asiedu A; Adeola O
J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 92(12):5583-92. PubMed ID: 25403199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mitigating the Environmental Impacts from Pig and Broiler Chicken Productions: Case Study on a Citrus Extract Feed Additive.
Bui H; Cisse SH; Ceccaldi M; Perrin A; Benarbia MEA; Chicoteau P
Animals (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 38067054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of exogenous enzymes in corn-based and Canadian pearl millet-based diets with reduced soybean meal on growth performance, intestinal nutrient digestibility, villus development, and selected microbial populations in broiler chickens.
Baurhoo N; Baurhoo B; Zhao X
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4100-8. PubMed ID: 21821810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reducing environmental pollution using animal feed enzymes.
Graham H; Simmins PH; Sands J
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(2 Pt A):285-9. PubMed ID: 15296179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant.
Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
