These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27286192)

  • 1. Classification of Resistance to Permeation Caused by Fouling during Ultrafiltration of Whey and Skim Milk.
    Koutake M; Matsuno I; Nabetani H; Nakajima M; Watanabe A
    Biosci Biotechnol Biochem; 1992 Jan; 56(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 27286192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ measurement of deposit layer formation during skim milk filtration by MRI.
    Schork N; Schuhmann S; Nirschl H; Guthausen G
    Magn Reson Chem; 2019 Sep; 57(9):738-748. PubMed ID: 30604888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance, and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration.
    Piry A; Heino A; Kühnl W; Grein T; Ripperger S; Kulozik U
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):1590-602. PubMed ID: 22459807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of protein fouling during ultrafiltration using a two-layer membrane model.
    Boyd RF; Zydney AL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Aug; 59(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10099359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance assessment of membrane distillation for skim milk and whey processing.
    Hausmann A; Sanciolo P; Vasiljevic T; Kulozik U; Duke M
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 24268403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whey protein membrane processing methods and membrane fouling mechanism analysis.
    Wen-Qiong W; Yun-Chao W; Xiao-Feng Z; Rui-Xia G; Mao-Lin L
    Food Chem; 2019 Aug; 289():468-481. PubMed ID: 30955638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane fouling and selectivity mechanisms in effluent ultrafiltration coupled with flocculation.
    Soffer Y; Ben Aim R; Adin A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):123-34. PubMed ID: 16003970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential natural organic matter fouling of ceramic versus polymeric ultrafiltration membranes.
    Lee SJ; Kim JH
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():43-51. PubMed ID: 24238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of linear velocity and flux on performance of ceramic graded permeability membranes when processing skim milk at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):2619-32. PubMed ID: 24612815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sieving effect of heat-denatured milk proteins during ultrafiltration of skim milk. I. The preliminary approach.
    Erdem YK; Yuksel Z
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):1941-6. PubMed ID: 15905423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water.
    Kimura K; Hane Y; Watanabe Y; Amy G; Ohkuma N
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3431-41. PubMed ID: 15276760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New insights into the structure of membrane fouling by biomolecules using comparison with isotherms and ATR-FTIR local quantification.
    Habibi S; Rabiller-Baudry M; Lopes F; Bellet F; Goyeau B; Rakib M; Couallier E
    Environ Technol; 2022 Jan; 43(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 32543977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of transmembrane pressure control on energy efficiency during skim milk concentration by ultrafiltration at 10 and 50°C.
    Méthot-Hains S; Benoit S; Bouchard C; Doyen A; Bazinet L; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Nov; 99(11):8655-8664. PubMed ID: 27638263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separation of glycosylated caseinomacropeptide at pilot scale using membrane adsorption in direct-capture mode.
    Kreuss M; Kulozik U
    J Chromatogr A; 2009 Dec; 1216(50):8771-7. PubMed ID: 19215932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture.
    Paredes Valencia A; Doyen A; Benoit S; Margni M; Pouliot Y
    Foods; 2018 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 30181438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yamamura H; Okimoto K; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2014 May; 54():123-36. PubMed ID: 24565803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.