These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27286726)

  • 21. The Speech Intelligibility Index and the pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing AIDS.
    Stiles DJ; Bentler RA; McGregor KK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):764-78. PubMed ID: 22223888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children.
    Mackie K; Dermody P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3724121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry.
    Ashoor AA; Prochazka T
    Audiology; 1982; 21(6):493-508. PubMed ID: 7181742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The development of Cantonese Lexical Neighborhood Test: a pilot study.
    Yuen KC; Ng IH; Luk BP; Chan SK; Chan SC; Kwok IC; Yu HC; Chan TM; Hung TC; Tong MC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1121-9. PubMed ID: 18485493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition.
    Meyer TA; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 10466571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a mandarin monosyllable recognition test.
    Tsai KS; Tseng LH; Wu CJ; Young ST
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 19125031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Word list for evaluating oral language perception in children with total and partial hearing impairment].
    Villalba Pérez A; Ferrández Mora JA; Ros Blasco V
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10217691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of Thai monosyllabic word and picture lists applicable to interactive speech audiometry in preschoolers.
    Hemakom A; Jitwiriyanont S; Rugchatjaroen A; Israsena P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Sep; 35(9):809-828. PubMed ID: 33146053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [200 years testing hearing disorders with speech, 50 years german speech audiometry -- a review].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Nov; 83(11):735-42. PubMed ID: 15538663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Distorted Freiburg Speech Test].
    Dieroff HG; Meissner W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Sep; 64(9):466-9. PubMed ID: 4079625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychometrically equivalent Mandarin bisyllabic speech discrimination materials spoken by male and female talkers.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):379-90. PubMed ID: 16136788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of content of initial instructions on the speech discrimination scores of hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Markides A
    Br J Audiol; 1979 Aug; 13(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 486817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part II--content of the first lexicon.
    Nott P; Cowan R; Brown PM; Wigglesworth G
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 19581807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Implementation of the speech comprehension test for complex syntactic structures (after D.V. Bishop) in 6- and 8-year-old primary school children].
    Feldhusen F; Brunner M; Heinrich C; Pröschel U
    HNO; 2007 Sep; 55(9):729-36. PubMed ID: 17415540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.