These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27286905)

  • 1. Meta analytical structural equation modeling: comments on issues with current methods and viable alternatives.
    Yuan KH
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 27286905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations.
    Cheung MW; Cheung SF
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Special issue on meta-analytic structural equation modeling: introduction from the guest editors.
    Cheung MW; Hafdahl AR
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 27286898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying meta-analysis to structural equation modeling.
    Hedges LV
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 27286904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Jun; 19(2):211-29. PubMed ID: 23834422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30175903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets.
    Wilson SJ; Polanin JR; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):121-39. PubMed ID: 27286899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latent variable models for multivariate longitudinal ordinal responses.
    Cagnone S; Moustaki I; Vasdekis V
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):401-15. PubMed ID: 18625083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic meta-analysis: conceptualization and computation.
    Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 19218849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis' by JJ Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 26, Published online, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3607.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2963-5; author reply 2965-6. PubMed ID: 21104939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "statcheck": Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta-analyses.
    Nuijten MB; Polanin JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):574-579. PubMed ID: 32275351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability.
    Peterson RA; Kim Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 23127213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of fit indices to outliers and leverage observations in structural equation modeling.
    Yuan KH; Zhong X
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 23527606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling.
    Schreiber JB
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2017; 13(3):634-643. PubMed ID: 27567146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.