447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287246)
1. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Surgery in Elderly and Very Elderly Gynecologic Cancer Patients.
Gallotta V; Conte C; D'Indinosante M; Federico A; Biscione A; Vizzielli G; Bottoni C; Carbone MV; Legge F; Uccella S; Ciocchetti P; Russo A; Polidori L; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):872-877. PubMed ID: 29339300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis.
Nezhat CR; Stevens A; Balassiano E; Soliemannjad R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 24928738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Pulmonary Complications in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.
Burks C; Nelson L; Kumar D; Fogg L; Saha C; Guirguis A; Rotmensch J; Dewdney S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):280-285. PubMed ID: 27836798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Yim GW; Eoh KJ; Chung YS; Kim SW; Kim S; Nam EJ; Lee JY; Kim YT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 29287717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
