These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287246)
81. Is total laparoscopic hysterectomy with longer operative time associated with a decreased benefit compared with total abdominal hysterectomy? Chakraborty N; Rhodes S; Luchristt D; Bretschneider CE; Sheyn D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 228(2):205.e1-205.e12. PubMed ID: 36202231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery. Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Evaluation of intra- and post-operative outcomes to compare robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy for gynecologic oncology. Wang LL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Hou F; Chen XH; Han LL; Xu LY; Xu H; Li J; Guo TK; Yang KH; Wang HL Asian J Surg; 2020 Jan; 43(1):347-353. PubMed ID: 31229360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Robotic-Assisted Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Cancers: Technique and Surgical Outcomes. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 29683877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis. de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Morbidity following robot-assisted surgery in a gynecological oncology setting: A cohort study. Markauskas A; Blaakær J; Traen KJ; Neumann GA; Chunsen W; Petersen LK Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Aug; 103(8):1672-1679. PubMed ID: 38874351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations]. Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications. Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Perioperative Outcomes for Laparotomy Compared to Robotic Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer in the Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort. Backes FJ; ElNaggar AC; Farrell MR; Brudie LA; Ahmad S; Salani R; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM; O'Malley DM Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Nov; 26(9):1717-1721. PubMed ID: 27575633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer]. Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Gynecologic oncology robot-assisted surgery in octogenarians: Impact of age on hospital stay. Levin G; Brezinov Y; Brodeur MN; Salvador S; Lau S; Gotlieb W Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Nov; 167(2):784-788. PubMed ID: 38751198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Outcomes of robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease using the Medtronic Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgical platform: a single center experience. Rottoli M; Cardelli S; Calini G; Alexa ID; Violante T; Poggioli G Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Oct; 39(1):158. PubMed ID: 39384631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancer Staging: Current Evidence. Bogani G; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Scaffa C; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 26802906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Comparison of the Memory Foam Pad Versus the Bean Bag with Shoulder Braces in Preventing Patient Displacement during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery. Farag S; Rosen L; Ascher-Walsh C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 28919502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. [Robotic-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: the Register of the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery]. Hanssens S; Nisolle M; Leguevaque P; Neme RM; Cela V; Barton-Smith P; Hébert T; Collinet P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Nov; 42(11):744-8. PubMed ID: 25442821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report. Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications. Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):665.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26188114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center. Moulton LJ; Jernigan AM; Michener CM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 28673874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]