These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287246)
101. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases. Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy: Can a Robotic Approach Improve Short-Term Outcomes and Operative Safety? Mahieu J; Rinieri P; Bubenheim M; Calenda E; Melki J; Peillon C; Baste JM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 64(4):354-62. PubMed ID: 25866978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures. Unger CA; Lachiewicz MP; Ridgeway B Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 27591050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
104. Robot-assisted, single-site, dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with the new da Vinci platform: a stage 2a study. Buffi NM; Lughezzani G; Fossati N; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Lista G; Larcher A; Abrate A; Fiori C; Cestari A; Porpiglia F Eur Urol; 2015 Jan; 67(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 24656756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. [Gynecologic robotic surgery and our initial experience]. Pilka R; Dzvincuk P Ceska Gynekol; 2010 Dec; 75(6):512-7. PubMed ID: 27534006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
106. Endowrist versus wrist: a case-controlled study comparing robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Koh FH; Tan KK; Lieske B; Tsang ML; Tsang CB; Koh DC Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Oct; 24(5):452-6. PubMed ID: 25275815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective French multicentric study (2008-2019) using the Society of European Robotic Gynecological Surgery endometriosis database. Saget E; Peschot C; Bonin L; Belghiti J; Boulland E; Ghesquiere L; Golfier F; Hebert T; Kerbage Y; Lavoue V; Merlot B; Motton S; Ternynck C; Vidal F; Gauthier T; Collinet P Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 35113234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center. Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. Major complications of operative gynecologic laparoscopy in southern Taiwan: a follow-up study. Tian YF; Lin YS; Lu CL; Chia CC; Huang KF; Shih TY; Shen KH; Chung MT; Tsai YC; Chao CH; Wu MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 17478357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. Safety Model for the Introduction of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Gomes MTV; Costa Porto BTD; Parise Filho JP; Vasconcelos AL; Bottura BF; Marques RM Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 40(7):397-402. PubMed ID: 29775973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
111. Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients. Kim TJ; Yoon G; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26197858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112. Is robotic-assisted sacrocolpo(hystero)pexy safe and effective in women over 65 years of age? Sanci A; Akpinar C; Gokce MI; Süer E; Gülpinar O Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2211-2217. PubMed ID: 33587163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
114. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
115. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy. Doo DW; Guntupalli SR; Corr BR; Sheeder J; Davidson SA; Behbakht K; Jarrett MJ; Guy MS Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3687-94. PubMed ID: 25672563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics. Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
117. Impact of robotics on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer. Lavoue V; Zeng X; Lau S; Press JZ; Abitbol J; Gotlieb R; How J; Wang Y; Gotlieb WH Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):556-62. PubMed ID: 24708920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
118. Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against conventional laparoscopy. Ngu JC; Ng YY J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):647-653. PubMed ID: 29470772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
119. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
120. Surgical approaches in women with endometrial cancer with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m Raventós-Tato RM; de la Torre-Fernández de Vega J; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Díaz-Feijoó B; Sabadell J; Pérez-Benavente MA; Gil-Moreno A J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jan; 45(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 30191628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]