661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287305)
1. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Morimoto S; Rebello de Sampaio FB; Braga MM; Sesma N; Özcan M
J Dent Res; 2016 Aug; 95(9):985-94. PubMed ID: 27287305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysis.
Naik VB; Jain AK; Rao RD; Naik BD
J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(4):347-355. PubMed ID: 36187858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies.
Vagropoulou GI; Klifopoulou GL; Vlahou SG; Hirayama H; Michalakis K
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 45(11):903-920. PubMed ID: 30019391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sampaio FBWR; Özcan M; Gimenez TC; Moreira MSNA; Tedesco TK; Morimoto S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):561-571. PubMed ID: 31840412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review.
Fathy H; Hamama HH; El-Wassefy N; Mahmoud SH
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):3807-3822. PubMed ID: 35320383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review.
Fron Chabouis H; Smail Faugeron V; Attal JP
Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1209-18. PubMed ID: 24119328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bustamante-Hernández N; Montiel-Company JM; Bellot-Arcís C; Mañes-Ferrer JF; Solá-Ruíz MF; Agustín-Panadero R; Fernández-Estevan L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33086485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
Otto T; De Nisco S
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Main Clinical Outcomes of Feldspathic Porcelain and Glass-Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Complication Rates.
Morimoto S; Albanesi RB; Sesma N; Agra CM; Braga MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 26757327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term Clinical Performance of Composite Resin or Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Fan J; Xu Y; Si L; Li X; Fu B; Hannig M
Oper Dent; 2021 Jan; 46(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 33882133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin.
Schulte AG; Vöckler A; Reinhardt R
J Dent; 2005 May; 33(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 15833400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of all-ceramic inlays and onlays after a mean observation time of 11 years.
Strasding M; Sebestyén-Hüvös E; Studer S; Lehner C; Jung RE; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(7):566-576. PubMed ID: 32500864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate versus indirect resin composite partial posterior restorations - A 7.8-year retrospective study.
Lempel E; Gyulai S; Lovász BV; Jeges S; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 37821330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.
Fron Chabouis H; Prot C; Fonteneau C; Nasr K; Chabreron O; Cazier S; Moussally C; Gaucher A; Khabthani Ben Jaballah I; Boyer R; Leforestier JF; Caumont-Prim A; Chemla F; Maman L; Nabet C; Attal JP
Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():278. PubMed ID: 24004961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Resistance of Partial Indirect Restorations Made With CAD/CAM Technology. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Amesti-Garaizabal A; Agustín-Panadero R; Verdejo-Solá B; Fons-Font A; Fernández-Estevan L; Montiel-Company J; Solá-Ruíz MF
J Clin Med; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31717610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.
Beier US; Kapferer I; Burtscher D; Giesinger JM; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 22720292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
