152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287445)
1. How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria.
Lerche V; Voss A; Nagler M
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):513-537. PubMed ID: 27287445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30.
Voss A; Voss J; Lerche V
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():336. PubMed ID: 25870575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.
Lerche V; Voss A
Psychol Res; 2017 May; 81(3):629-652. PubMed ID: 27107855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The EZ diffusion method: too EZ?
Ratcliff R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1218-28. PubMed ID: 19001593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction.
Voss A; Nagler M; Lerche V
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(6):385-402. PubMed ID: 23895923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious.
Lerche V; Voss A
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1324. PubMed ID: 27679585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speed-accuracy manipulations and diffusion modeling: Lack of discriminant validity of the manipulation or of the parameter estimates?
Lerche V; Voss A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2568-2585. PubMed ID: 29542062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Eight Parameter Estimation Methods for the Ratcliff Diffusion Model Using Free Software.
Alexandrowicz RW; Gula B
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():484737. PubMed ID: 33117213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model.
Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HL; Dolan CV; Grasman RP
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1229-35. PubMed ID: 19001594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model.
Voss A; Voss J; Klauer KC
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):539-55. PubMed ID: 20030967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods.
Arnold NR; Bröder A; Bayen UJ
Psychol Res; 2015 Sep; 79(5):882-98. PubMed ID: 25281426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model.
Holmes WR; Trueblood JS
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):730-743. PubMed ID: 28597236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.
White CN; Servant M; Logan GD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):286-301. PubMed ID: 28357629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.
Ratcliff R; Tuerlinckx F
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):438-81. PubMed ID: 12412886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the impact of mindfulness meditation training on working memory: a mathematical modeling approach.
van Vugt MK; Jha AP
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 11(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 21732031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The counterintuitive impact of responses and response times on parameter estimates in the drift diffusion model.
Jordan P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):289-315. PubMed ID: 31328270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Seven-parameter Diffusion Model: an Implementation in Stan for Bayesian Analyses.
Henrich F; Hartmann R; Pratz V; Voss A; Klauer KC
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3102-3116. PubMed ID: 37640960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.
Lerche V; Voss A
Psychol Res; 2019 Sep; 83(6):1194-1209. PubMed ID: 29224184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The urgency-gating model can explain the effects of early evidence.
Carland MA; Thura D; Cisek P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1830-8. PubMed ID: 26452377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for time-variant decision making.
Ditterich J
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3628-41. PubMed ID: 17229111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
