These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27287930)

  • 1. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
    Reynolds V; Buckland A; Bailey J; Lipscombe J; Nathan E; Vijayasekaran S; Kelly R; Maryn Y; French N
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.
    Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
    Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
    Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population.
    Jayakumar T; Rajasudhakar R; Benoy JJ
    J Voice; 2024 Sep; 38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. PubMed ID: 35337701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.
    Englert M; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):160.e15-160.e21. PubMed ID: 31474432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for Voice Disorders in Older Adults (RAVI)-Part III: Cutoff Score and Clinical Consistency.
    Pernambuco L; Espelt A; Costa de Lima K
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):117.e17-117.e22. PubMed ID: 27085911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity.
    Barsties B; Maryn Y
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
    Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
    Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.
    Englert M; Lima L; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):810.e11-810.e17. PubMed ID: 31005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
    Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.