246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27288090)
1. Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.
Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Teixidó-Tura G; Galuppo V; Cuéllar H; Laynez A; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas MT; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Sep; 29(9):819-826.e4. PubMed ID: 27288090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of proximal aortic diameter in hypertensive patients: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Leone D; Tosello F; Faletti R; Schivazappa G; Bruno G; Avenatti E; Ravera A; Veglio F; Milan A
J Hypertens; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 28399041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multimodality imaging of aortic dimensions: comparison of transthoracic echocardiography with multidetector row computed tomography.
Tsang JF; Lytwyn M; Farag A; Zeglinski M; Wallace K; daSilva M; Bohonis S; Walker JR; Tam JW; Strzelczyk J; Jassal DS
Echocardiography; 2012 Jul; 29(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 22404245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technological Advancements in Echocardiographic Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Dilatation: Head to Head Comparison Among Multidetector Computed Tomography, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Measurements.
Ghulam Ali S; Fusini L; Dalla Cia A; Tamborini G; Gripari P; Muratori M; Mancini ME; Annoni A; Formenti A; Pepi M
J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Jul; 33(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 29927868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of ascending aortic aneurysms in Marfan patients using ECG-gated computerized tomographic angiography versus trans-thoracic echocardiography.
Amsallem M; Ou P; Milleron O; Henry-Feugeas MC; Detaint D; Arnoult F; Vahanian A; Jondeau G
Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 184():22-27. PubMed ID: 25705006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transthoracic Echocardiography versus Computed Tomography for Ascending Aortic Measurements in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Park JY; Foley TA; Bonnichsen CR; Maurer MJ; Goergen KM; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Williamson EE; Michelena HI
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Jul; 30(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28501375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root: comparison of 2D and 3D transthoracic echocardiography with multidetector computed tomography.
Visby L; Kristensen CB; Pedersen FHG; Sigvardsen PE; Kofoed KF; Hassager C; Møgelvang R
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1156-1163. PubMed ID: 30879047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ascending aorta diameters measured by echocardiography using both leading edge-to-leading edge and inner edge-to-inner edge conventions in healthy volunteers.
Muraru D; Maffessanti F; Kocabay G; Peluso D; Dal Bianco L; Piasentini E; Jose SP; Iliceto S; Badano LP
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 15(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24096712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement of Proximal Thoracic Aorta Size by Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
Agdamag AC; Patel P; Duval S; Konety S
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 193():28-33. PubMed ID: 36863269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cine cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography derived diameters of the aortic root in a large population-based cohort.
Wenzel JP; Nikorowitsch J; Bei der Kellen R; Dohm L; Girdauskas E; Lund G; Bannas P; Blankenberg S; Kölbel T; Cavus E; Müllerleile K; Kaul MG; Adam G; Weinrich JM
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15307. PubMed ID: 36096919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
van der Linde D; Rossi A; Yap SC; McGhie JS; van den Bosch AE; Kirschbaum SW; Russo B; van Dijk AP; Moelker A; Krestin GP; van Geuns RJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
Echocardiography; 2013 May; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic root dimensions are predominantly determined by genetic factors: a classical twin study.
Celeng C; Kolossváry M; Kovács A; Molnár AÁ; Szilveszter B; Horváth T; Károlyi M; Jermendy ÁL; Tárnoki ÁD; Tárnoki DL; Karády J; Voros S; Jermendy G; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2419-2425. PubMed ID: 27659700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Abdel-Aty H; Schulz-Menger J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 20583398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normal Values and Differences in Ascending Aortic Diameter in a Healthy Population of Adults as Measured by the Pediatric versus Adult American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines.
Bossone E; Yuriditsky E; Desale S; Ferrara F; Vriz O; Asch FM
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Feb; 29(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 26601702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of aging and body size on proximal and ascending aorta and aortic arch: inner edge-to-inner edge reference values in a large adult population by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
Mirea O; Maffessanti F; Gripari P; Tamborini G; Muratori M; Fusini L; Claudia C; Fiorentini C; Plesea IE; Pepi M
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Apr; 26(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 23337735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multimodality Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Dimensions: Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Echocardiography Measurements.
Frazao C; Tavoosi A; Wintersperger BJ; Nguyen ET; Wald RM; Ouzounian M; Hanneman K
J Thorac Imaging; 2020 Nov; 35(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 32251236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements.
Weinrich JM; Avanesov M; Lenz A; Tahir E; Henes FO; Schoennagel BP; Rybczinsky M; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Bannas P
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 32314122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dynamic changes in aortic diameter during the cardiac cycle measured by computed tomography angiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
Huang J; Wang Y; Lin L; Li Z; Shan Z; Zheng S
J Vasc Surg; 2019 May; 69(5):1538-1544. PubMed ID: 31010518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of Asymmetry and Valvular Morphotype on Echocardiographic Measurements of the Aortic Root in Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Vis JC; Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Teixidó-Tura G; Galian-Gay L; Granato C; Guala A; Sao-Aviles A; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30269911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are Aortic Root and Ascending Aorta Diameters Measured by the Pediatric versus the Adult American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines Interchangeable?
Servato ML; Teixidó-Turá G; Sabate-Rotes A; Galian-Gay L; Gutiérrez L; Valente F; Fernandez-Galera R; Casas G; López-Sainz A; González-Alujas MT; Sao-Aviles A; Ferreira I; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Evangelista A
J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
