159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27288541)
1. Scalar utility theory and proportional processing: What does it actually imply?
Rosenström T; Wiesner K; Houston AI
J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():222-235. PubMed ID: 27288541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.
Marsh B; Kacelnik A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Mar; 99(5):3352-5. PubMed ID: 11867709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A temporal basis for Weber's law in value perception.
Namboodiri VM; Mihalas S; Hussain Shuler MG
Front Integr Neurosci; 2014; 8():79. PubMed ID: 25352791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?
Shapiro MS; Schuck-Paim C; Kacelnik A
Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 21925575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.
Monteiro T; Vasconcelos M; Kacelnik A
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Apr; 280(1756):20122386. PubMed ID: 23390098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dopamine reward prediction error responses reflect marginal utility.
Stauffer WR; Lak A; Schultz W
Curr Biol; 2014 Nov; 24(21):2491-500. PubMed ID: 25283778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explicit melioration by a neural diffusion model.
Simen P; Cohen JD
Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1299():95-117. PubMed ID: 19646968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay.
Bateson M; Kacelnik A
J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 May; 63(3):313-29. PubMed ID: 7751835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.
Genest W; Stauffer WR; Schultz W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(30):8402-7. PubMed ID: 27402743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.
Ferro GM; Sornette D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243661. PubMed ID: 33315897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Behavioral modeling of human choices reveals dissociable effects of physical effort and temporal delay on reward devaluation.
Klein-Flügge MC; Kennerley SW; Saraiva AC; Penny WD; Bestmann S
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004116. PubMed ID: 25816114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer JR; Townsend JT
Psychol Rev; 1993 Jul; 100(3):432-59. PubMed ID: 8356185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mathematical framework for probabilistic choice based on information theory and psychophysics.
Takahashi T
Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(1):183-6. PubMed ID: 16516404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-sensitivity: crossroads for theories of decision-making.
Kacelnik A; Bateson M
Trends Cogn Sci; 1997 Nov; 1(8):304-9. PubMed ID: 21223933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tests of an indifference rule in variable-delay and double-reward choice procedures with humans.
McKerchar TL; Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):387-404. PubMed ID: 31038743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monkeys choose as if maximizing utility compatible with basic principles of revealed preference theory.
Pastor-Bernier A; Plott CR; Schultz W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Mar; 114(10):E1766-E1775. PubMed ID: 28202727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.
Grace RC
J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jul; 60(1):185-201. PubMed ID: 16812697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analytical Calculation of Errors in Time and Value Perception Due to a Subjective Time Accumulator: A Mechanistic Model and the Generation of Weber's Law.
Namboodiri VM; Mihalas S; Hussain Shuler MG
Neural Comput; 2016 Jan; 28(1):89-117. PubMed ID: 26599714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transitivity of preferences.
Regenwetter M; Dana J; Davis-Stober CP
Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 21244185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risky choice and Weber's Law.
Kacelnik A; Brito e Abreu F
J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 9778440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
