1713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27288987)
1. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer compared with laparotomy.
Terai Y; Tanaka T; Sasaki H; Kawaguchi H; Fujiwara S; Yoo S; Tanaka Y; Tsunetoh S; Kanemura M; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):570-5. PubMed ID: 24118459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic surgery for early endometrial cancer.
Bennich G; Rudnicki M; Lassen PD
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Aug; 95(8):894-900. PubMed ID: 27100141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.
Johnson L; Bunn WD; Nguyen L; Rice J; Raj M; Cunningham MJ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 27812904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
