These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27288989)

  • 1. A comparison of single-sample estimators of effective population sizes from genetic marker data.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4692-711. PubMed ID: 27288989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making sense of genetic estimates of effective population size.
    Waples RS
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Oct; 25(19):4689-91. PubMed ID: 27671356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long-lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears.
    Kamath PL; Haroldson MA; Luikart G; Paetkau D; Whitman C; van Manen FT
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Nov; 24(22):5507-21. PubMed ID: 26510936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. speed-ne: Software to simulate and estimate genetic effective population size (N
    Hamilton MB; Tartakovsky M; Battocletti A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):714-728. PubMed ID: 29397009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population genetics of autopolyploids under a mixed mating model and the estimation of selfing rate.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 25981126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches.
    Skrbinšek T; Jelenčič M; Waits L; Kos I; Jerina K; Trontelj P
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):862-75. PubMed ID: 22229706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating selfing rates from reconstructed pedigrees using multilocus genotype data.
    Wang J; El-Kassaby YA; Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jan; 21(1):100-16. PubMed ID: 22106925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2148-64. PubMed ID: 19389175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for detecting recent changes in contemporary effective population size from linkage disequilibrium at linked and unlinked loci.
    Hollenbeck CM; Portnoy DS; Gold JR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Oct; 117(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 27165767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interannual variation in effective number of breeders and estimation of effective population size in long-lived iteroparous lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens).
    Duong TY; Scribner KT; Forsythe PS; Crossman JA; Baker EA
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(5):1282-94. PubMed ID: 23293919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of single-sample effective size estimators using empirical toad (Bufo calamita) population data: genetic compensation and population size-genetic diversity correlations.
    Beebee TJ
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(23):4790-7. PubMed ID: 19863715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome screens using linkage disequilibrium tests: optimal marker characteristics and feasibility.
    Chapman NH; Wijsman EM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1872-85. PubMed ID: 9837839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unbiased Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium from Unphased Data.
    Ragsdale AP; Gravel S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Mar; 37(3):923-932. PubMed ID: 31697386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.
    Maenhout S; De Baets B; Haesaert G
    Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Apr; 118(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 19224194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
    Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?
    Waples RS
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Oct; 14(11):3335-52. PubMed ID: 16156807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
    Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.