These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27288989)

  • 41. Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation.
    Tallmon DA; Luikart G; Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 2004 Jun; 167(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 15238546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.
    Fernández J; Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15879510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimation of effective population size in continuously distributed populations: there goes the neighborhood.
    Neel MC; McKelvey K; Ryman N; Lloyd MW; Short Bull R; Allendorf FW; Schwartz MK; Waples RS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Sep; 111(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 23652561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. On selecting markers for association studies: patterns of linkage disequilibrium between two and three diallelic loci.
    Garner C; Slatkin M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 12508256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium between unlinked loci: theory and application to fruit fly outbreak populations.
    Sved JA; Cameron EC; Gilchrist AS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69078. PubMed ID: 23894410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multi-marker linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci.
    Lee S; Yang J; Huang J; Chen H; Hou W; Wu S
    Brief Bioinform; 2017 Mar; 18(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 26966282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accounting for missing data in the estimation of contemporary genetic effective population size (N(e) ).
    Peel D; Waples RS; Macbeth GM; Do C; Ovenden JR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Mar; 13(2):243-53. PubMed ID: 23280157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Power of transmission/disequilibrium tests in admixed populations.
    Li MX; Jiang L; Song YQ; Sham PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 32(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 18278814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimating contemporary effective population size on the basis of linkage disequilibrium in the face of migration.
    Waples RS; England PR
    Genetics; 2011 Oct; 189(2):633-44. PubMed ID: 21840864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can genetic estimators provide robust estimates of the effective number of breeders in small populations?
    Hoehn M; Gruber B; Sarre SD; Lange R; Henle K
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48464. PubMed ID: 23139784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conservation.
    Miller CR; Waits LP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Apr; 100(7):4334-9. PubMed ID: 12655042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of multilocus linkage disequilibria in diploid populations with dominant markers.
    Li Y; Li Y; Wu S; Han K; Wang Z; Hou W; Zeng Y; Wu R
    Genetics; 2007 Jul; 176(3):1811-21. PubMed ID: 17565957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Genetic diversity of a New Zealand multi-breed sheep population and composite breeds' history revealed by a high-density SNP chip.
    Brito LF; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Schenkel FS; Clarke SM
    BMC Genet; 2017 Mar; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28288558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2002 Mar; 160(3):1203-15. PubMed ID: 11901134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Purging putative siblings from population genetic data sets: a cautionary view.
    Waples RS; Anderson EC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 28099771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Required properties for markers used to calculate unbiased estimates of the genetic correlation between populations.
    Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL; Duenk P; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):65. PubMed ID: 30547748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.