These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27289025)
1. Ultrasonography Significantly Overestimates Stone Size When Compared to Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography. Sternberg KM; Eisner B; Larson T; Hernandez N; Han J; Pais VM Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():67-71. PubMed ID: 27289025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: a correlation with computed tomography. Viprakasit DP; Sawyer MD; Herrell SD; Miller NL J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 22010975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of renal stone. Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 24908592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of ureteral stone. Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H Urology; 2014 Sep; 84(3):533-7. PubMed ID: 25168527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Johnson EK; Faerber GJ; Roberts WW; Wolf JS; Park JM; Bloom DA; Wan J Urology; 2011 Sep; 78(3):662-6. PubMed ID: 21722946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Motley G; Dalrymple N; Keesling C; Fischer J; Harmon W Urology; 2001 Aug; 58(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 11489691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones. Van Appledorn S; Ball AJ; Patel VR; Kim S; Leveillee RJ J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):851-4; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 14744347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal Radiography With Digital Tomosynthesis: An Alternative to Computed Tomography for Identification of Urinary Calculi? Wollin DA; Gupta RT; Young B; Cone E; Kaplan A; Marin D; Patel BN; Mazurowski MA; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():56-61. PubMed ID: 30006268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the stone composition of children preoperatively by Hounsfield unit detection on non-contrast computed tomography. Altan M; Çitamak B; Bozaci AC; Güneş A; Doğan HS; Haliloğlu M; Tekgül S J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):505.e1-505.e6. PubMed ID: 28427913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images. Dai JC; Dunmire B; Sternberg KM; Liu Z; Larson T; Thiel J; Chang HC; Harper JD; Bailey MR; Sorensen MD World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):727-732. PubMed ID: 29243111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Tomosynthesis: A Viable Alternative to Noncontrast Computed Tomography for the Follow-Up of Nephrolithiasis? Cabrera FJ; Kaplan AG; Youssef RF; Tsivian M; Shin RH; Scales CD; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 27078715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-vitro comparison of different slice thicknesses and kernel settings for measurement of urinary stone size by computed tomography. Umbach R; Müller JK; Wendt-Nordahl G; Knoll T; Jessen JP Urolithiasis; 2019 Dec; 47(6):583-586. PubMed ID: 30649576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing stone attenuation in low- and conventional-dose noncontrast computed tomography. Alsyouf M; Smith DL; Olgin G; Heldt JP; Lightfoot M; Li R; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 24517291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. Eisner BH; Kambadakone A; Monga M; Anderson JK; Thoreson AA; Lee H; Dretler SP; Sahani DV J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1710-5. PubMed ID: 19230922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stone heterogeneity index on single-energy noncontrast computed tomography can be a positive predictor of urinary stone composition. Lee JS; Cho KS; Lee SH; Yoon YE; Kang DH; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee JY PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193945. PubMed ID: 29649219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limited sensitivity and size over measurements of ultrasound affect medical decisions for ureteral stone compared to non-contrasted computed tomography. Hanqi L; Fucai T; Caixia Z; Shuman Z; Guohua Z; Zhaohui H World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):907-911. PubMed ID: 30109485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan. Dundee P; Bouchier-Hayes D; Haxhimolla H; Dowling R; Costello A J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1005-9. PubMed ID: 17206892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting urinary stone composition based on single-energy noncontrast computed tomography: the challenge of cystine. Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; De S; Yamaçake KG; Mazzucchi E; Monga M Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1258-63. PubMed ID: 24726314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of ultrasonography in detecting urinary tract calculi compared to CT scan. Ahmed F; Askarpour MR; Eslahi A; Nikbakht HA; Jafari SH; Hassanpour A; Makarem A; Salama H; Ayoub A Res Rep Urol; 2018; 10():199-203. PubMed ID: 30510920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]