These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27289422)

  • 1. The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique.
    Rosa E; Perea M; Enneson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():133-42. PubMed ID: 27289422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical priming from partial-word previews.
    Inhoff AW; Tousman S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):825-36. PubMed ID: 2147444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does viotin activate violin more than viocin? On the use of visual cues during visual-word recognition.
    Perea M; Panadero V
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23948388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the process of recognizing inverted words: does it rely only on orientation-invariant cues?
    Navon D; Raveh O
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1103-17. PubMed ID: 15813493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Third and fifth graders' processing of parafoveal information in reading: A study in single-word recognition.
    Khelifi R; Sparrow L; Casalis S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():1-17. PubMed ID: 26057197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The search for an input-coding scheme: transposed-letter priming in Arabic.
    Perea M; Mallouh RA; Carreiras M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 20551361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?
    Macnevin C; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 12066419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27873186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency.
    Grainger J; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):951-64. PubMed ID: 8228845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.