696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27290607)
1. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and
Pyka T; Okamoto S; Dahlbender M; Tauber R; Retz M; Heck M; Tamaki N; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2114-2121. PubMed ID: 27290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hybrid
Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Bone Uptake in Bone Scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Acar E; Bekiş R; Polack B
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(6):589-594. PubMed ID: 32008568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Knol RJJ; Burgers AMG; Bos SD; de Jong IJ; Pruim J
World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29043431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
Simsek DH; Sanli Y; Civan C; Engin MN; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Kuyumcu S
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 34(7):476-485. PubMed ID: 32394269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraindividual Comparison of
Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Lawal IO; Ankrah AO; Mokgoro NP; Vorster M; Maes A; Sathekge MM
Prostate; 2017 Aug; 77(11):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 28649735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic accuracy of
Daniels H; Gilbert R; Bonin L
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Sep; 54(3):545-555. PubMed ID: 37211439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective comparison of
Zacho HD; Nielsen JB; Afshar-Oromieh A; Haberkorn U; deSouza N; De Paepe K; Dettmann K; Langkilde NC; Haarmark C; Fisker RV; Arp DT; Carl J; Jensen JB; Petersen LJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1884-1897. PubMed ID: 29876619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic performance of bone scintigraphy and (11)C-Choline PET/CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer].
Garcia JR; Moreno C; Valls E; Cozar P; Bassa P; Soler M; Alvarez-Moro FJ; Moragas M; Riera E
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2015; 34(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 25443648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy.
Morigi JJ; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Ho B; Nguyen Q; Hruby G; Fogarty G; Jagavkar R; Kneebone A; Hickey A; Fanti S; Tarlinton L; Emmett L
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1185-90. PubMed ID: 26112024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
