142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27290836)
1. [Recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia pre-conization with diathermic handle].
Merlos-Gutiérrez AL; Vargas-Espinosa JM; González-González G; Martínez-García M; Sereno-Coló JA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2016 Feb; 84(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 27290836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loop diathermy or laser excisional conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Vejerslev LO; Schouenborg L; Sørensen F; Nielsen D; Sørensen SS; Juhl BR; Rygaard C; Junge J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 10577621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Thai women.
Wongtiraporn W; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Benjapibal M; Rattanachaiyanont M; Ruengkhachorn I; Chaopotong P; Laiwejpithaya S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7757-61. PubMed ID: 25292059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases.
Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Kakuda M; Kubota S; Matsuzaki S; Iwamiya T; Okazawa A; Matsuzaki S; Hashimoto K; Kobayashi E; Mabuchi S; Sawada K; Tomimatsu T; Yoshino K; Kimura T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):921-926. PubMed ID: 28451844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the trend toward less deep excisions in LLETZ to minimize obstetric risk lead to less favorable oncological outcomes?
Lara-Peñaranda R; Rodríguez-López PM; Plitt-Stevens J; Ortiz-González A; Remezal-Solano M; Martínez-Cendán JP
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Mar; 148(3):316-324. PubMed ID: 31814122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prognostic factors of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions treated by cold knife conization with negative margin].
Meng QW; Qin ZH; Mao Y; Zhao XD
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 42(7):457-9. PubMed ID: 17961334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability.
Matsumura M; Ota T; Takeshima N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 20683412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
