These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2729098)
1. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media. Smid T; Schokkin E; Boleij JS; Heederik D Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 2729098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enumeration and identification of airborne viable mould propagules in houses. A field comparison of selected techniques. Verhoeff AP; van Wijnen JH; Boleij JS; Brunekreef B; van Reenen-Hoekstra ES; Samson RA Allergy; 1990 May; 45(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 2382792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sampling for airborne fungi: a statistical comparison of media. Morring KL; Sorenson WG; Attfield MD Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Sep; 44(9):662-4. PubMed ID: 6637812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of sampling media for environmental viable fungi collected in a hospital environment. Wu PC; Su HJ; Ho HM Environ Res; 2000 Mar; 82(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 10702333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents. Yao M; Mainelis G J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 16912697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers. Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols. Yao M; Mainelis G J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between sampling duration and concentration of culturable airborne mould and bacteria on selected culture media. Godish DR; Godish TJ J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 102(6):1479-84. PubMed ID: 17578412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total airborne mold particle sampling: evaluation of sample collection, preparation and counting procedures, and collection devices. Godish D; Godish T J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 18085480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability of airborne microflora in a hospital ward within a period of one year. Augustowska M; Dutkiewicz J Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 16841880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative efficiencies of two air sampling methods and three culture conditions for the assessment of airborne culturable fungi in a poultry farmhouse in France. Nieguitsila A; Arné P; Durand B; Deville M; Benoît-Valiergue H; Chermette R; Cottenot-Latouche S; Guillot J Environ Res; 2011 Feb; 111(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 21215966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Presence of viable mould propagules in the indoor air of houses. Verhoeff AP; van Wijnen JH; Fischer P; Brunekreef B; Boleij JS; van Reenen ES; Samson RA Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):133-45. PubMed ID: 2274978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational exposure to bioburden in Portuguese bakeries: an approach to sampling viable microbial load. Viegas C; Monteiro A; Carolino E; Viegas S Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2018 Sep; 69(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 30285943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler. Madsen AM; Sharma AK Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics. Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments. An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of environmental factors on airborne fungi in houses of Santa Fe City, Argentina. Basilico Mde L; Chiericatti C; Aringoli EE; Althaus RL; Basilico JC Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 376(1-3):143-50. PubMed ID: 17320936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments. Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An inter-laboratory evaluation of selective media for the detection and enumeration of yeasts from blue-veined cheese. Viljoen BC; Knox A; Beuchat LR; Deak T; Malfeito-Ferreira M; Hansen TK; Hugo A; Jakobsen M; Loureiro V; Lourens-Hattingh A; Vasdinnyei R Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15172480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of mycological air pollution in selected rooms of residential and dormitory housing facilities. Lonc E; Plewa K; Kiewra D; Szczepańska A; Firling CE Ann Parasitol; 2013; 59(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 24791345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]