These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2729196)

  • 1. Effects of a fixed magnetic appliance on the dentofacial complex.
    Kalra V; Burstone CJ; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):467-78. PubMed ID: 2729196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3855346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Oct; 76(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 291343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction.
    Forsberg CM; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 1984 May; 6(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 6587967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First premolar extractions and fixed appliances in the Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Carter NE
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3164207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skeletal and dental effects during observation and treatment with a magnetic device.
    Meral O; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 14719738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions.
    Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 6939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances.
    Buongiorno M; Iacopetti F; Beretta M; Lanteri C; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 23260532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
    Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance.
    Falck F; Fränkel R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Oct; 96(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 2801639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term treatment effects of the quad-helix appliance on dentofacial morphology of hyperdivergent patients.
    Endo S; Yamada W; Shundo I; Kobayashi Y; Komatsuzakit A; Endo T
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 Nov; 32(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 29509347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.