These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27292446)

  • 1. Patterns of morphological integration in the dental arches of individuals with malocclusion.
    Miller SF; Vela KC; Levy SM; Southard TE; Gratton DG; Moreno Uribe LM
    Am J Hum Biol; 2016 Nov; 28(6):879-889. PubMed ID: 27292446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.
    Papagiannis A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 25840587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The form of the human dental arch.
    Braun S; Hnat WP; Fender DE; Legan HL
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Feb; 68(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9503132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of arch forms depending on the angle classification.
    Bourzgui F; Khribchi A; Rachdy Z; Housbane S; Othmani MB
    Int Orthod; 2016 Dec; 14(4):528-536. PubMed ID: 27867068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 16627179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis and comparison of dental arch symmetry between different Angle's malocclusion categories and normal occlusion].
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 35(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 11780475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted morphological analysis of dental casts with maxillary prognathism and reversed occlusion.
    Kojima T; Sohmura T; Wakabayashi K; Kinuta S; Nagao M; Dei N; Nakamura T; Takahashi J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15125593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models.
    Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study on the dental arch width in Class II malocclusion].
    Xu JP; Shen PM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 16400487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in dental and alveolar arch dimensions among different malocclusion groups in a sample of untreated patients.
    Boodhoo K; Du Y; Qin P; You X; Liu X
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 21827050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion.
    Banabilh SM; Rajion ZA; Samsudin R; Singh GD
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 17203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians.
    Alvaran N; Roldan SI; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 19409348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluctuating Dental Arch Asymmetry in Different Malocclusion Groups.
    Škrinjarić A; Šlaj M; Šlaj M
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2018 Jun; 52(2):105-113. PubMed ID: 30034009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion.
    Uysal T; Usumez S; Memili B; Sari Z
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 16279827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Morphology of the upper arch in unilateral posterior crossbite].
    Ferro A; Perillo L
    Mondo Ortod; 1991; 16(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2072948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.