These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27293021)
1. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions. Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study). Voros S; Rinehart S; Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Kalynych A; Karmpaliotis D; Qian Z; Joshi PH; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Ballard W; Brown C Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 24238960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Yong AS; Ng AC; Brieger D; Lowe HC; Ng MK; Kritharides L Eur Heart J; 2011 Feb; 32(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 20705695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting functionally significant coronary lesions. Lee J; Seo KW; Yang HM; Lim HS; Choi BJ; Choi SY; Tahk SJ; Yoon MH Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2020 Oct; 10(5):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 33224749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve. Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of lumen area parameters determined by intravascular ultrasound to predict functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Cui M; Zhu D; Guo LJ; Song LY; Zhang YZ; Zhang FC; Niu J; Wang GS; Han JL; Gao W Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(9):1606-11. PubMed ID: 23652037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between 3D-QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses. Tomaniak M; Masdjedi K; van Zandvoort LJ; Neleman T; Tovar Forero MN; Vermaire A; Kochman J; Kardys I; den Dekker W; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Van Mieghem NM; Zijlstra F; Daemen J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E495-E501. PubMed ID: 32725862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis. Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative angiography in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions: correlation with fractional flow reserve. Naganuma T; Latib A; Costopoulos C; Takagi K; Naim C; Sato K; Miyazaki T; Kawaguchi M; Panoulas VF; Basavarajaiah S; Figini F; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Carlino M; Colombo A Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 24444471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters. Zafar H; Ullah I; Dinneen K; Matiullah S; Hanley A; Leahy MJ; Sharif F J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24368093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography can detect reliably ischemic coronary lesions based on fractional flow reserve. Chung WY; Choi BJ; Lim SH; Matsuo Y; Lennon RJ; Gulati R; Sandhu GS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Lerman A J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Jun; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 26028923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Better Diagnosis of Functionally Significant Intermediate Sized Narrowings Using Intravascular Ultrasound-Minimal Lumen Area and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Myocardial Segmentation. Kang SJ; Yang DH; Kweon J; Kim YH; Lee JG; Jung J; Kim N; Mintz GS; Kang JW; Lim TH; Park SW Am J Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 117(8):1282-8. PubMed ID: 26892449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between fractional flow reserve and angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters in ostial lesions: major epicardial vessel versus side branch ostial lesions. Koh JS; Koo BK; Kim JH; Yang HM; Park KW; Kang HJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 22516397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between minimum lumen cross-sectional area and intraluminal ultrasonic intensity analysis using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound for prediction of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Takami H; Sonoda S; Muraoka Y; Miura T; Shimizu A; Anai R; Sanuki Y; Miyamoto T; Oginosawa Y; Fujino Y; Tsuda Y; Araki M; Otsuji Y Heart Vessels; 2019 Feb; 34(2):208-217. PubMed ID: 30062429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]