148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27293476)
41. Axial-shear strain distributions in an elliptical inclusion model: experimental validation and in vivo examples with implications to breast tumor classification.
Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):814-20. PubMed ID: 20420971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Thee-Dimensional Single-Track-Location Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.
Hollender P; Lipman SL; Trahey GE
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Dec; 64(12):1784-1794. PubMed ID: 28885153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Target motion predictions for pre-operative planning during needle-based interventions.
op den Buijs J; Abayazid M; de Korte CL; Misra S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5380-5. PubMed ID: 22255554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nonlinear Shear Modulus Estimation With Bi-Axial Motion Registered Local Strain.
Goswami S; Ahmed R; Doyley MM; McAleavey SA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Aug; 66(8):1292-1303. PubMed ID: 31150340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Elasticity reconstruction from displacement and confidence measures of a multi-compressed ultrasound RF sequence.
Li J; Cui Y; Kadour M; Noble JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18334339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Rheological assessment of a polymeric spherical structure using a three-dimensional shear wave scattering model in dynamic spectroscopy elastography.
Montagnon E; Hadj-Henni A; Schmitt C; Cloutier G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Feb; 61(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 24474134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Ultrasound viscoelasticity assessment using an adaptive torsional shear wave propagation method.
Ouared A; Kazemirad S; Montagnon E; Cloutier G
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1603. PubMed ID: 27036560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Understanding the Contrast Mechanism in Rotation Elastogram: A Parametric Study.
Lokesh B; Ten Dam AM; de Korte CL; Thittai AK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1860-1872. PubMed ID: 29801975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Repeatability of Linear and Nonlinear Elastic Modulus Maps From Repeat Scans in the Breast.
Gendin DI; Nayak R; Wang Y; Bayat M; Fazzio RT; Oberai AA; Hall TJ; Barbone PE; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 40(2):748-757. PubMed ID: 33151880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Multi-source and multi-directional shear wave generation with intersecting steered ultrasound push beams.
Nabavizadeh A; Song P; Chen S; Greenleaf JF; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):647-62. PubMed ID: 25881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Digital image elasto-tomography: mechanical property estimation of silicone phantoms.
Peters A; Chase JG; Van Houten EE
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Mar; 46(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 17978841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: A study of feasibility and reproducibility using an ergonomic pillow-like passive driver.
Huang X; Chafi H; Matthews KL; Carmichael O; Li T; Miao Q; Wang S; Jia G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 59():68-76. PubMed ID: 30858002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Performance assessment of HIFU lesion detection by harmonic motion imaging for focused ultrasound (HMIFU): a 3-D finite-element-based framework with experimental validation.
Hou GY; Luo J; Marquet F; Maleke C; Vappou J; Konofagou EE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2013-27. PubMed ID: 22036637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Identification process based on shear wave propagation within a phantom using finite element modelling and magnetic resonance elastography.
Leclerc GE; Charleux F; Ho Ba Tho MC; Bensamoun SF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 23947476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Can Shoulder Muscle Activity Be Evaluated With Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography?
Kim K; Hwang HJ; Kim SG; Lee JH; Jeong WK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 29698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of mechanical and ultrasound elastic modulus of ovine tibial cortical bone.
Grant CA; Wilson LJ; Langton C; Epari D
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):869-74. PubMed ID: 24793408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Nonlinear elastic behavior of phantom materials for elastography.
Pavan TZ; Madsen EL; Frank GR; Adilton O Carneiro A; Hall TJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(9):2679-92. PubMed ID: 20400811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
