These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2729391)

  • 1. Luteinizing hormone and ovulation timing in a therapeutic donor insemination program using frozen semen.
    Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Parker RA; Rogers BJ; Dalglish CS; Herbert GM; Wentz AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 1):1169-72. PubMed ID: 2729391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Therapeutic donor insemination: the impact of insemination timing with the aid of a urinary luteinizing hormone immunoassay.
    Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Herbert CM; Brodie BL; Dalglish CS; Dupont WD; Wentz AC
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Jun; 49(6):1026-9. PubMed ID: 3286288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiency of therapeutic donor insemination using a luteinizing hormone monitor.
    Federman CA; Dumesic DA; Boone WR; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Sep; 54(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 2204553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapeutic cup insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm: prognostic value of cervical mucus score at insemination and the number of motile sperm in mucus at 24 hours.
    Meyer WR; Smith PM; Clark MR; Cusmano LL; Fritz MA
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 8751744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound in the timing of artificial insemination with frozen donor semen.
    Saaranen M; Suhonen M; Saarikoski S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 3536682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
    Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.
    Smith KD; Rodriguez-Rigau LJ; Steinberger E
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Oct; 36(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 7286272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of fecundability with fresh and frozen semen in therapeutic donor insemination.
    Bordson BL; Ricci E; Dickey RP; Dunaway H; Taylor SN; Curole DN
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 3743796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for improvement of the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen.
    Comhaire FH; Thiery M
    Int J Androl; 1986 Feb; 9(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 3744584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
    Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial donor insemination frozen versus fresh semen.
    Leeton J; Selwood T; Trounson A; Wood C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Nov; 20(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 6940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing urinary luteinizing hormone dipsticks and basal body temperature charts with time donor insemination.
    Barratt CL; Cooke S; Chauhan M; Cooke ID
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Sep; 52(3):394-7. PubMed ID: 2673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semen analysis data from fresh and cryopreserved donor ejaculates: comparison of cryoprotectants and pregnancy rates.
    Keel BA; Webster BW
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 2744176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of transvaginal sonography combined with a urinary luteinizing hormone monitor in timing donor insemination.
    Irons DW; Singh M
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1859-62. PubMed ID: 7844216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of semen quality and follicular growth between conception and non-conception cycles after artificial insemination by donor using cryopreserved semen.
    Glander HJ; Baier D; Haake KW
    Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 2899563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: a decade of experience.
    Kovacs G; Baker G; Burger H; De Kretser D; Lording D; Lee J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Apr; 95(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 3382608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved cryopreserved semen fecundability in an alternating fresh-frozen artificial insemination program.
    Brown CA; Boone WR; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Nov; 50(5):825-7. PubMed ID: 3181497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semen and cervical mucus parameters and success in artificial insemination.
    Boyers AI; Shenfield F; Valentine A
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1108-14. PubMed ID: 1806571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insemination with fresh donor semen.
    Meeks GR; McDonald J; Gookin K; Bates GW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 68(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 3748503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial insemination in Denmark by frozen donor semen supplied from a central bank.
    Hansen KB; Nielsen NC; Rebbe H
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 May; 86(5):384-6. PubMed ID: 465386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.