220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2729391)
1. Luteinizing hormone and ovulation timing in a therapeutic donor insemination program using frozen semen.
Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Parker RA; Rogers BJ; Dalglish CS; Herbert GM; Wentz AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 1):1169-72. PubMed ID: 2729391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic donor insemination: the impact of insemination timing with the aid of a urinary luteinizing hormone immunoassay.
Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Herbert CM; Brodie BL; Dalglish CS; Dupont WD; Wentz AC
Fertil Steril; 1988 Jun; 49(6):1026-9. PubMed ID: 3286288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative efficiency of therapeutic donor insemination using a luteinizing hormone monitor.
Federman CA; Dumesic DA; Boone WR; Shapiro SS
Fertil Steril; 1990 Sep; 54(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 2204553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Therapeutic cup insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm: prognostic value of cervical mucus score at insemination and the number of motile sperm in mucus at 24 hours.
Meyer WR; Smith PM; Clark MR; Cusmano LL; Fritz MA
Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 8751744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound in the timing of artificial insemination with frozen donor semen.
Saaranen M; Suhonen M; Saarikoski S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 3536682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.
Smith KD; Rodriguez-Rigau LJ; Steinberger E
Fertil Steril; 1981 Oct; 36(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 7286272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fecundability with fresh and frozen semen in therapeutic donor insemination.
Bordson BL; Ricci E; Dickey RP; Dunaway H; Taylor SN; Curole DN
Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 3743796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for improvement of the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen.
Comhaire FH; Thiery M
Int J Androl; 1986 Feb; 9(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 3744584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial donor insemination frozen versus fresh semen.
Leeton J; Selwood T; Trounson A; Wood C
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Nov; 20(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 6940563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing urinary luteinizing hormone dipsticks and basal body temperature charts with time donor insemination.
Barratt CL; Cooke S; Chauhan M; Cooke ID
Fertil Steril; 1989 Sep; 52(3):394-7. PubMed ID: 2673842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semen analysis data from fresh and cryopreserved donor ejaculates: comparison of cryoprotectants and pregnancy rates.
Keel BA; Webster BW
Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 2744176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of transvaginal sonography combined with a urinary luteinizing hormone monitor in timing donor insemination.
Irons DW; Singh M
Hum Reprod; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1859-62. PubMed ID: 7844216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of semen quality and follicular growth between conception and non-conception cycles after artificial insemination by donor using cryopreserved semen.
Glander HJ; Baier D; Haake KW
Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 2899563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: a decade of experience.
Kovacs G; Baker G; Burger H; De Kretser D; Lording D; Lee J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Apr; 95(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 3382608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved cryopreserved semen fecundability in an alternating fresh-frozen artificial insemination program.
Brown CA; Boone WR; Shapiro SS
Fertil Steril; 1988 Nov; 50(5):825-7. PubMed ID: 3181497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semen and cervical mucus parameters and success in artificial insemination.
Boyers AI; Shenfield F; Valentine A
Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1108-14. PubMed ID: 1806571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insemination with fresh donor semen.
Meeks GR; McDonald J; Gookin K; Bates GW
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 68(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 3748503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial insemination in Denmark by frozen donor semen supplied from a central bank.
Hansen KB; Nielsen NC; Rebbe H
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 May; 86(5):384-6. PubMed ID: 465386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
