142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27294723)
1. Non-use Economic Values for Little-Known Aquatic Species at Risk: Comparing Choice Experiment Results from Surveys Focused on Species, Guilds, and Ecosystems.
Rudd MA; Andres S; Kilfoil M
Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 27294723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of regional and national values for recovering threatened and endangered marine species in the United States.
Wallmo K; Lew DK
J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 179():38-46. PubMed ID: 27160027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National-Level Wetland Policy Specificity and Goals Vary According to Political and Economic Indicators.
Peimer AW; Krzywicka AE; Cohen DB; Van den Bosch K; Buxton VL; Stevenson NA; Matthews JW
Environ Manage; 2017 Jan; 59(1):141-153. PubMed ID: 27624708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mangrove and Freshwater Wetland Conservation Through Carbon Offsets: A Cost-Benefit Analysis for Establishing Environmental Policies.
Vázquez-González C; Moreno-Casasola P; Hernández ME; Campos A; Espejel I; Fermán-Almada JL
Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 59(2):274-290. PubMed ID: 27848002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Economic Value of the Greater Montreal Blue Network (Quebec, Canada): A Contingent Choice Study Using Real Projects to Estimate Non-Market Aquatic Ecosystem Services Benefits.
Poder TG; Dupras J; Fetue Ndefo F; He J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158901. PubMed ID: 27513558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: Why put economic values on Nature?
Salles JM
C R Biol; 2011 May; 334(5-6):469-82. PubMed ID: 21640956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk and markets for ecosystem services.
Bendor TK; Riggsbee JA; Doyle M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10322-30. PubMed ID: 22044319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Habitat Equivalency Analysis to Assess the Cost Effectiveness of Restoration Outcomes in Four Institutional Contexts.
Scemama P; Levrel H
Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 26306791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring conflicts in the management of anthropized ecosystems: Evidence from a choice experiment in a human-created Mediterranean wetland.
Perni Á; Martínez-Paz JM
J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):40-50. PubMed ID: 28778004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species richness accelerates marine ecosystem restoration in the Coral Triangle.
Williams SL; Ambo-Rappe R; Sur C; Abbott JM; Limbong SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(45):11986-11991. PubMed ID: 29078320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: an application of stated preference choice experiments.
Wallmo K; Lew DK
J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1793-801. PubMed ID: 21392881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow regime in a restored wetland determines trophic links and species composition in the aquatic macroinvertebrate community.
González-Ortegón E; Walton ME; Moghaddam B; Vilas C; Prieto A; Kennedy HA; Pedro Cañavate J; Le Vay L
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 503-504():241-50. PubMed ID: 25242150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Water ecosystem services in northern Australia--how much are they worth and who should pay for their provision?
Zander KK; Parkes R; Straton A; Garnett ST
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64411. PubMed ID: 23717611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.
Obeng EA; Aguilar FX
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():458-471. PubMed ID: 29107802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antarctic fisheries: factor climate change into their management.
Brooks CM; Ainley DG; Abrams PA; Dayton PK; Hofman RJ; Jacquet J; Siniff DB
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):177-180. PubMed ID: 29899493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical habitat for threatened and endangered species: how should the economic costs be evaluated?
Plantinga AJ; Helvoigt TL; Walker K
J Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 134():127-35. PubMed ID: 24473346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive management of large aquatic ecosystem recovery programs in the United States.
Thom R; St Clair T; Burns R; Anderson M
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 2):424-430. PubMed ID: 27545987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value.
Dallimer M; Tinch D; Hanley N; Irvine KN; Rouquette JR; Warren PH; Maltby L; Gaston KJ; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):404-13. PubMed ID: 24372643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating cultural benefits from surface water status improvements in freshwater wetland ecosystems.
Roebeling P; Abrantes N; Ribeiro S; Almeida P
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 545-546():219-26. PubMed ID: 26747985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
