206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27294775)
1. Third trimester ultrasound soft-tissue measurements accurately predicts macrosomia.
Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Martinelli P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(8):972-976. PubMed ID: 27294775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes.
Garabedian C; Vambergue A; Salleron J; Deruelle P
Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of birthweight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness improves the detection of macrosomic fetuses.
Scioscia M; Stepniewska A; Trivella G; De Mitri P; Bettocchi S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1325-8. PubMed ID: 25231406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements.
Chauhan SP; West DJ; Scardo JA; Boyd JM; Joiner J; Hendrix NW
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 95(5):639-42. PubMed ID: 10775720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Morlando M; Martinelli P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():66-70. PubMed ID: 27180271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia cannot be improved by combination with pregnancy-specific characteristics.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Kurmanavicius J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 19266500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies.
Mintz MC; Landon MB; Gabbe SG; Marinelli DL; Ludmir J; Grumbach K; Arger PH; Coleman BG
Am J Perinatol; 1989 Apr; 6(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 2653337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography for Estimation of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity in the Setting of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia.
Gibson KS; Stetzer B; Catalano PM; Myers SA
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1123-9. PubMed ID: 27091915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Mazzone E; Dall'Asta A; Kiener AJO; Carpano MG; Suprani A; Ghi T; Frusca T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional versus three-dimensional ultrasound in fetal renal pelvis measurement and their potential prediction of neonatal uropathies.
Duin LK; Nijhuis JG; Scherjon SA; Vossen M; Willekes C
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(15):2494-9. PubMed ID: 26430907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malin GL; Bugg GJ; Takwoingi Y; Thornton JG; Jones NW
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second- to Third-Trimester Longitudinal Growth Assessment for the Prediction of Largeness for Gestational Age and Macrosomia in an Unselected Population.
Caradeux J; Eixarch E; Mazarico E; Basuki TR; Gratacós E; Figueras F
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 43(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 28719900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy.
Higgins MF; Russell NM; Mulcahy CH; Coffey M; Foley ME; McAuliffe FM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Sep; 140(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18406510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the availability of maternal HbA1c results improve the accuracy of sonographic diagnosis of macrosomia?
Weissmann-Brenner A; O'Reilly-Green C; Ferber A; Divon MY
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 23(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 15133797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
