These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27294775)

  • 21. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
    Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abdominal circumference vs. estimated weight to predict large for gestational age birth weight in diabetic pregnancy.
    Holcomb WL; Mostello DJ; Gray DL
    Clin Imaging; 2000; 24(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11120409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Third trimester ultrasound for the prediction of the large for gestational age fetus in low-risk population and evaluation of contingency strategies.
    Pilalis A; Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Michalitsi V; Panagopoulos P; Chrelias C; Kassanos D
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Sep; 32(9):846-53. PubMed ID: 22729391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Third trimester ultrasound for fetal macrosomia: optimal timing and institutional specific accuracy.
    Parikh LI; Iqbal SN; Jelin AC; Overcash RT; Tefera E; Fries MH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(8):1337-1341. PubMed ID: 29183184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing.
    Sylvestre G; Divon MY; Onyeije C; Fisher M
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 11132584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Correlation between ultrasonographic measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness and selected fetal ultrasonographic and maternal anthropometric parameters].
    Abdalla N; Bachanek M; Kania M; Roguska M; Cendrowski K; Sawicki W
    Ginekol Pol; 2015 Dec; 86(12):915-20. PubMed ID: 26995941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth.
    Hackmon R; Bornstein E; Ferber A; Horani J; O'Reilly Green CP; Divon MY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):333.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17403410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
    Ben-Haroush A; Melamed N; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Yogev Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue parameters and its role in the prediction of birth weight.
    O'Connor C; Farah N; O'Higgins A; Segurado R; Fitzpatrick C; Turner MJ; Stuart B; Kennelly MM
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):945-51. PubMed ID: 23716034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
    Pagani G; Palai N; Zatti S; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
    Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict macrosomia.
    Mazouni C; Rouzier R; Ledu R; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 17444564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia.
    O'Reilly-Green C; Divon M
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 43(2):309-20. PubMed ID: 10863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relationship between maternal body composition in early pregnancy and foetal mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness in the third trimester in a high-risk obstetric population.
    Anglim B; Farah N; O'Connor C; Daly N; Kennelly MM; Turner MJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jul; 37(5):591-594. PubMed ID: 28366035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intrapartum prediction of macrosomia: accuracy of abdominal circumference estimation.
    Al-Inany H; Alaa N; Momtaz M; Abdel Badii M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2001; 51(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 11223705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detecting fetal macrosomia with abdominal circumference alone.
    Henrichs C; Magann EF; Brantley KL; Crews JH; Sanderson M; Chauhan SP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 12815906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
    Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.