These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27294952)

  • 1. Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11-24 Year-Old.
    Bradley J; Simpson E; Poliakov I; Matthews JN; Olivier P; Adamson AJ; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2016 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 27294952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
    Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field Testing of the Use of Intake24-An Online 24-Hour Dietary Recall System.
    Rowland MK; Adamson AJ; Poliakov I; Bradley J; Simpson E; Olivier P; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30404170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iterative Development of an Online Dietary Recall Tool: INTAKE24.
    Simpson E; Bradley J; Poliakov I; Jackson D; Olivier P; Adamson AJ; Foster E
    Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28208763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using 4 technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study.
    Whitton C; Collins CE; Mullan BA; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Pollard CM; Healy JD; Hassan A; Garg S; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Kerr DA
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Jul; 120(1):196-210. PubMed ID: 38710447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews.
    Wark PA; Hardie LJ; Frost GS; Alwan NA; Carter M; Elliott P; Ford HE; Hancock N; Morris MA; Mulla UZ; Noorwali EA; Petropoulou K; Murphy D; Potter GDM; Riboli E; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
    BMC Med; 2018 Aug; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 30089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years.
    Albar SA; Alwan NA; Evans CE; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
    Br J Nutr; 2016 May; 115(9):1678-86. PubMed ID: 26975650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies.
    Liu B; Young H; Crowe FL; Benson VS; Spencer EA; Key TJ; Appleby PN; Beral V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Nov; 14(11):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 21729481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Subar AF; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Thompson FE; Kahle LL; George SM; Dodd KW; Potischman N
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2014 Jul; 100(1):233-40. PubMed ID: 24787491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
    Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a Web-Based 24-h Dietary Recall Tool (Foodbook24) to an Interviewer-Led 24-h Dietary Recall.
    Timon CM; Evans K; Kehoe L; Blain RJ; Flynn A; Gibney ER; Walton J
    Nutrients; 2017 Apr; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 28441358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progressive 24-Hour Recall: Usability Study of Short Retention Intervals in Web-Based Dietary Assessment Surveys.
    Osadchiy T; Poliakov I; Olivier P; Rowland M; Foster E
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13266. PubMed ID: 32012055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of food portion size estimation methods among 11-12 year olds: 3D food models vs an online tool using food portion photos (Intake24).
    Bradley J; Rowland MK; Matthews JNS; Adamson AJ; Spence S
    BMC Nutr; 2021 May; 7(1):10. PubMed ID: 33952349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Douglass D; Zimmerman TP; Kahle LL; Thompson FE; George SM; Subar AF
    J Nutr; 2016 Dec; 146(12):2567-2573. PubMed ID: 27807039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting Perceived Problems in Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls: A Quantitative Think-Aloud Study Comparing Automated Self-Assisted 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24
    Mackenzie KM; Kerr DA; Whitton C; Talati Z; McCaffrey TA; Mullan BA
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36296964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the relative validity of a web-based self-administered 24-hour dietary recall in a Canadian adolescent's population.
    Drapeau V; Laramée C; Lafreniere J; Trottier C; Brochu C; Robitaille J; Lamarche B; Lemieux S
    Nutr J; 2024 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 38907225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of an interactive 24-h recall and weighed food record for measuring energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods among 9-10-month-old Malawian infants consuming lipid-based nutrient supplements.
    Hemsworth J; Arimond M; Kumwenda C; Rehman AM; Maleta K; Ashorn U; Keogh R; Ferguson EL
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1262-1271. PubMed ID: 30350761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment Method for Pregnant Women.
    Ashman AM; Collins CE; Brown LJ; Rae KM; Rollo ME
    Nutrients; 2017 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28106758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The number of 24 h dietary recalls using the US Department of Agriculture's automated multiple-pass method required to estimate nutrient intake in overweight and obese adults.
    Stote KS; Radecki SV; Moshfegh AJ; Ingwersen LA; Baer DJ
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Oct; 14(10):1736-42. PubMed ID: 21414246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Development, Validation, and User Evaluation of Foodbook24: A Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool Developed for the Irish Adult Population.
    Timon CM; Blain RJ; McNulty B; Kehoe L; Evans K; Walton J; Flynn A; Gibney ER
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e158. PubMed ID: 28495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.