566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27295907)
1. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V
Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses.
Koning JL; Davenport KP; Poole PS; Kruk PG; Grabowski JE
J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Typical and unusual sonoelastographic patterns of breast cystic lesions: impact on BI-RADS classification.
Chiorean AR; Duma MM; Dudea SM; Bolboaca S; Dumitriu D; Eniu D; Sfrangeu SA
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E138-E144. PubMed ID: 20972948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions.
Reinikainen HT; Rissanen TJ; Piippo UK; Päivänsalo MJ
Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 10394865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization.
Liberman L; Kaplan J; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; LaTrenta LR; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 11517048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided?
Guo Y; Raghu M; Durand M; Hooley R
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
