182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27296727)
1. Clinical benefit of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins in breast conserving surgery.
Lee ES; Han W; Shin HC; Takada M; Ryu HS; Cho N; Kim MK; Kim J; Yoo TK; Moon HG; Toi M; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1169-75. PubMed ID: 27296727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive margins prediction in breast cancer conservative surgery: Assessment of a preoperative web-based nomogram.
Alves-Ribeiro L; Osório F; Amendoeira I; Fougo JL
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():167-73. PubMed ID: 27326978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines.
Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.
Yoon J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 21(8):946-954. PubMed ID: 32677379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frozen sections in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery at a single ambulatory surgical center: 5 year experience.
Jorns JM; Daignault S; Sabel MS; Myers JL; Wu AJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 28215733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-operative digital specimen radiology reduces re-operation rates in therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer.
Majdak-Paredes EJ; Schaverien MV; Szychta P; Raine C; Dixon JM
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26119619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-operative assessment of excised breast tumour margins using ClearEdge imaging device.
Dixon JM; Renshaw L; Young O; Kulkarni D; Saleem T; Sarfaty M; Sreenivasan R; Kusnick C; Thomas J; Williams LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1834-1840. PubMed ID: 27591938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
