These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27297230)

  • 21. Development of a successful research grant application.
    Woodward DK; Clifton GD
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 51(6):813-22. PubMed ID: 8010324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [German Research Foundation (DFG) Early Career Investigators Workshop in Health Services Research: concept - progress - feedback].
    Scherer M; Lühmann D; Raspe H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 22325107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.
    Tamblyn R; Girard N; Qian CJ; Hanley J
    CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(16):E489-E499. PubMed ID: 29685909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.
    King KM; Pardo YJ; Norris KC; Diaz-Romero M; Morris D; Vassar SD; Brown AF
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Oct; 8(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 26365589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective or predatory funding? Evaluating the hidden costs of grant applications.
    Dresler M; Buddeberg E; Endesfelder U; Haaker J; Hof C; Kretschmer R; Pflüger D; Schmidt F
    Immunol Cell Biol; 2023 Feb; 101(2):104-111. PubMed ID: 36214095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Research funding in German ophthalmology].
    Ziemssen F; Meltendorf C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Nov; 229(11):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22826187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Writing a Research Grant - 1, Applying for Funding.
    Schembri-Wismayer P; Cuschieri S; Grech V
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Dec; 127():106-108. PubMed ID: 30077571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors impacting successfully competing for research funding: an analysis of applications submitted to the Plastic Surgery Foundation.
    Hume KM; Giladi AM; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):429e-435e. PubMed ID: 25626827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tips on writing successful grant proposals.
    Hodgson C
    Nurse Pract; 1989 Feb; 14(2):44, 46, 49 passim. PubMed ID: 2927750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
    Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Opportunities and Challenges Of The Ethics Review Of Qualitative Health Services Research: A Survey Of Qualitative Researchers].
    Kremeike K; Jünger S; Preiser C; Ullrich C; Xyländer M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2024 Aug; 86(8-09):567-572. PubMed ID: 38316407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
    Long T; Fallon D
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.
    Fowler EA; Bell K; Burns K; Chiazzese A; DeSerres SA; Foster BJ; Hartwig S; Herrington G; James MT; Jensen V; Jones N; Kidston S; Lemay S; Levin A; MacPhee A; McCutcheon S; Ravani P; Samuel S; Scholey J; Takano T; Tangri N; Verdin N; Alexander RT; Clase CM
    Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2022; 9():20543581221136402. PubMed ID: 36406869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical issues in headache research and management: report and recommendations of the ethics subcommittee of the International Headache Society.
    International Headache Society. Ethics Subcommittee
    Cephalalgia; 1998 Sep; 18(7):505-29. PubMed ID: 11645127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Discussion on Governmental Research Grants.
    Fang H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 25143309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
    NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.