These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27298356)

  • 1. Carryover effects drive competitive dominance in spatially structured environments.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(25):6939-44. PubMed ID: 27298356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habitat-mediated carry-over effects lead to context-dependent outcomes of species interactions.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Nov; 84(6):1646-56. PubMed ID: 26060938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ghosts of habitats past: environmental carry-over effects drive population dynamics in novel habitat.
    Van Allen BG; Rudolf VH
    Am Nat; 2013 May; 181(5):596-608. PubMed ID: 23594544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natal habitat-biased dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel.
    Selonen V; Hanski IK; Desrochers A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Aug; 274(1621):2063-8. PubMed ID: 17567559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of extinction-colonization dynamics in Mediterranean butterflies: the role of landscape, climate and local habitat features.
    Fernández-Chacón A; Stefanescu C; Genovart M; Nichols JD; Hines JE; Páramo F; Turco M; Oro D
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):276-85. PubMed ID: 23957287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of asymmetric dispersal on the coexistence of competing species.
    Salomon Y; Connolly SR; Bode L
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Apr; 13(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 20100238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carryover effects from natal habitat type upon competitive ability lead to trait divergence or source-sink dynamics.
    Kristensen NP; Johansson J; Chisholm RA; Smith HG; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1341-1352. PubMed ID: 29938889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Socially informed dispersal in a territorial cooperative breeder.
    Cozzi G; Maag N; Börger L; Clutton-Brock TH; Ozgul A
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):838-849. PubMed ID: 29344939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations.
    Clobert J; Le Galliard JF; Cote J; Meylan S; Massot M
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Mar; 12(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 19170731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographical structure of a highly mobile bird.
    Fletcher RJ; Robertson EP; Wilcox RC; Reichert BE; Austin JD; Kitchens WM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species persistence in landscapes with spatial variation in habitat quality: a pair approximation model.
    Liao J; Li Z; Hiebeler DE; Iwasa Y; Bogaert J; Nijs I
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 335():22-30. PubMed ID: 23792314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of non-random dispersal strategies on spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Amarasekare P
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):282-93. PubMed ID: 19682160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Replicated landscape genetic and network analyses reveal wide variation in functional connectivity for American pikas.
    Castillo JA; Epps CW; Jeffress MR; Ray C; Rodhouse TJ; Schwalm D
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Sep; 26(6):1660-1676. PubMed ID: 27755691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint effects of habitat heterogeneity and species' life-history traits on population dynamics in spatially structured landscapes.
    Ye X; Skidmore AK; Wang T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107742. PubMed ID: 25232739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the effects of spatial heterogeneity and temporal variation in extinction probability on mosquito populations.
    Alcalay Y; Tsurim I; Ovadia O
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Dec; 27(8):2342-2358. PubMed ID: 28851019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Natal habitat imprinting counteracts the diversifying effects of phenotype-dependent dispersal in a spatially structured population.
    Camacho C; Canal D; Potti J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16():158. PubMed ID: 27503506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How individual links affect network stability in a large-scale, heterogeneous metacommunity.
    Brodie JF; Mohd-Azlan J; Schnell JK
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 27859156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural habitat predicts functional dispersal habitat of a large carnivore: how leopards change spots.
    Fattebert J; Robinson HS; Balme G; Slotow R; Hunter L
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1911-21. PubMed ID: 26591456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A graphical-mechanistic approach to spatial resource competition.
    Haegeman B; Loreau M
    Am Nat; 2015 Jan; 185(1):E1-13. PubMed ID: 25560561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.