These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27299290)

  • 1. Comparison of DNA polymerases for improved forensic analysis of challenging samples.
    Nilsson M; Grånemo J; Buś MM; Havsjö M; Allen M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():55-59. PubMed ID: 27299290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extensive evaluation of DNA polymerase performance for highly degraded human DNA samples.
    Kim K; Bazarragchaa M; Brenner CH; Choi BS; Kim KY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():171-8. PubMed ID: 25912182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymerase resistance to polymerase chain reaction inhibitors in bone*.
    Eilert KD; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):1001-7. PubMed ID: 19686392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quadruplex real-time qPCR assay for the simultaneous assessment of total human DNA, human male DNA, DNA degradation and the presence of PCR inhibitors in forensic samples: a diagnostic tool for STR typing.
    Hudlow WR; Chong MD; Swango KL; Timken MD; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):108-25. PubMed ID: 19083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of PCR amplification yield and specificity using AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase.
    Moretti T; Koons B; Budowle B
    Biotechniques; 1998 Oct; 25(4):716-22. PubMed ID: 9793657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synergy between DNA polymerases increases polymerase chain reaction inhibitor tolerance in forensic DNA analysis.
    Hedman J; Nordgaard A; Dufva C; Rasmusson B; Ansell R; Rådström P
    Anal Biochem; 2010 Oct; 405(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 20599651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved forensic DNA analysis through the use of alternative DNA polymerases and statistical modeling of DNA profiles.
    Hedman J; Nordgaard A; Rasmusson B; Ansell R; Rådström P
    Biotechniques; 2009 Nov; 47(5):951-8. PubMed ID: 20041848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Quantification of Challenging Samples Applying Inhibitor-Tolerant DNA Polymerases.
    Sidstedt M; Romsos EL; Hedell R; Ansell R; Steffen CR; Vallone PM; Rådström P; Hedman J
    Anal Chem; 2017 Feb; 89(3):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 28118703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MPS analysis of the mtDNA hypervariable regions on the MiSeq with improved enrichment.
    Holland MM; Wilson LA; Copeland S; Dimick G; Holland CA; Bever R; McElhoe JA
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jul; 131(4):919-931. PubMed ID: 28078444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.
    Mulero JJ; Chang CW; Lagacé RE; Wang DY; Bas JL; McMahon TP; Hennessy LK
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):838-52. PubMed ID: 18540972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of SNPs in forensic casework: identification of pathological and autoptical specimens due to sample mix-up.
    Takada Y; Tokutomi T; Kanetake J; Mukaida M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S196-7. PubMed ID: 19289302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new sensitive short pentaplex (ShoP) PCR for typing of degraded DNA.
    Meissner C; Bruse P; Mueller E; Oehmichen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):121-7. PubMed ID: 16814503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of degradation in DNA from males with a quantitative gender typing, endpoint PCR multiplex.
    Smith BC; Vandegrift E; Fuller VM; Allen RW;
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 25537731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three different DNA extraction methods from a highly degraded biological material.
    Kuś M; Ossowski A; Zielińska G
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():47-53. PubMed ID: 27016882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a control region-based mtDNA SNaPshot™ selection tool, integrated into a mini amplicon sequencing method.
    Weiler NE; de Vries G; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 26976467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of microchip electrophoresis for the analysis of mitochondrial DNA in forensic and ancient DNA studies.
    Alonso A; Albarran C; Martín P; García P; Capilla J; García O; de la Rua C; Izaguirre N; Pereira F; Pereira L; Amorim A; Sancho M
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Dec; 27(24):5101-9. PubMed ID: 17120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA--a review.
    Alaeddini R; Walsh SJ; Abbas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Apr; 4(3):148-57. PubMed ID: 20215026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A reviewing for profiling of highly degraded remains].
    He BF; Lou DD
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 22(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 16850608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies.
    Alonso A; Martín P; Albarrán C; García P; García O; de Simón LF; García-Hirschfeld J; Sancho M; de La Rúa C; Fernández-Piqueras J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jan; 139(2-3):141-9. PubMed ID: 15040907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.