221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27299668)
1. Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Prostate Cancer.
Schreiter V; Reimann C; Geisel D; Schreiter NF
Rofo; 2016 Nov; 188(11):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27299668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET/CT With
Giovacchini G; Giovannini E; Riondato M; Ciarmiello A
Curr Radiopharm; 2018; 11(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 29090673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-Body Integrated [
Guberina N; Hetkamp P; Ruebben H; Fendler W; Grueneisen J; Suntharalingam S; Kirchner J; Puellen L; Harke N; Radtke JP; Umutlu L; Hadaschik BA; Herrmann K; Forsting M; Wetter A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):788-796. PubMed ID: 31482413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of
Regula N; Kostaras V; Johansson S; Trampal C; Lindström E; Lubberink M; Velikyan I; Sörensen J
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4993. PubMed ID: 32193430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels.
Kabasakal L; Demirci E; Nematyazar J; Akyel R; Razavi B; Ocak M; Aygun A; Obek C; Kural AR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Feb; 38(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 27893589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Caroli P; Sandler I; Matteucci F; De Giorgi U; Uccelli L; Celli M; Foca F; Barone D; Romeo A; Sarnelli A; Paganelli G
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2035-2044. PubMed ID: 29922948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of
Schwenck J; Rempp H; Reischl G; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 27557844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there a utility of adding skeletal imaging to 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography in initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
Raju S; Sharma A; Patel C; Sahoo R; Das CJ; Kumar S; Sharma A; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Nov; 41(11):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 32796451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiphasic
Beheshti M; Manafi-Farid R; Geinitz H; Vali R; Loidl W; Mottaghy FM; Langsteger W
J Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 32060214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Farolfi A; Fonti C; Lodi F; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 30350010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Significance of PSMA imaging in prostate cancer].
Gasch C; Düwel C; Kopka K; Kratochwil C; Vinsensia M; Eiber M; Maurer T; Haberkorn U; Hadaschik B; Giesel FL
Urologe A; 2017 Jan; 56(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 28005153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Evangelista L; Briganti A; Fanti S; Joniau S; Reske S; Schiavina R; Stief C; Thalmann GN; Picchio M
Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 26850970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
