241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27299773)
1. The influence of stimulus size on heterochromatic modulation electroretinograms.
Martins CM; Tsai T; Barboni MT; da Costa MF; Nagy B; Ventura DF; Kremers J
J Vis; 2016 Jun; 16(8):13. PubMed ID: 27299773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of temporal frequency and stimulus size on the relative contribution of luminance and L-/M-cone opponent mechanisms in heterochromatic flicker ERGs.
Kremers J; Aher AJ; Popov Y; Mirsalehi M; Huchzermeyer C
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Oct; 143(2):207-220. PubMed ID: 33886039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The spatial distribution of ERGs reflecting luminance and L-/M-cone-opponent signals.
Vidal KS; Aher AJ; Ventura DF; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 142(3):329-342. PubMed ID: 33506285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heterochromatic flicker electroretinograms reflecting luminance and cone opponent activity in glaucoma patients.
Barboni MT; Pangeni G; Ventura DF; Horn F; Kremers J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6757-65. PubMed ID: 21778269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rod- versus cone-driven ERGs at different stimulus sizes in normal subjects and retinitis pigmentosa patients.
Aher AJ; McKeefry DJ; Parry NRA; Maguire J; Murray IJ; Tsai TI; Huchzermeyer C; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 29134295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absence of ocular interaction in flicker ERG responses reflecting cone opponent and luminance signals.
Barboni MT; Ventura DF; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 121(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 20358391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatial properties of L- and M-cone inputs to electroretinograms that reflect different types of post-receptoral processing.
Jacob MM; Pangeni G; Gomes BD; Souza GS; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC; Maguire J; Parry NR; McKeefry DJ; Kremers J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121218. PubMed ID: 25785459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responses of Postreceptoral Pathways Elicited by L- and M-Cone Isolating ON- and OFF-Electroretinograms in Glaucoma Patients.
Aher AJ; Horn FK; Huchzermeyer C; Lämmer R; Kremers J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Jul; 62(9):14. PubMed ID: 34241626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-frequency characteristics of L- and M-cone driven electroretinograms.
Aher AJ; Jacob MM; Kremers J
Vision Res; 2019 Jun; 159():35-41. PubMed ID: 30926305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms and their response summation characteristics.
McAnany JJ; Park JC; Cao D
Vis Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 32():E018. PubMed ID: 26241372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dystrophin Is Required for Proper Functioning of Luminance and Red-Green Cone Opponent Mechanisms in the Human Retina.
Barboni MT; Martins CM; Nagy BV; Tsai T; Damico FM; da Costa MF; de Cassia R; Pavanello M; Lourenço NC; de Cerqueira AM; Zatz M; Kremers J; Ventura DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(8):3581-7. PubMed ID: 27388051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abnormal 8-Hz flicker electroretinograms in carriers of X-linked retinoschisis.
McAnany JJ; Park JC; Collison FT; Fishman GA; Stone EM
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 133(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 27369766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opponent and nonopponent contributions to the zebrafish electroretinogram using heterochromatic flicker photometry.
Patterson WF; McDowell AL; Hughes A; Bilotta J
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2002 May; 188(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 12012099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation of the human photopic ERG luminance-response function with the use of chromatic stimuli.
Rufiange M; Dumont M; Lachapelle P
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2321-30. PubMed ID: 15924945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of macaque and human L- and M-cone driven electroretinograms.
Kremers J; Aher AJ; Parry NRA; Patel NB; Frishman LJ
Exp Eye Res; 2021 May; 206():108556. PubMed ID: 33794198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. L- and M-cone isolating ERGs: LED versus CRT stimulation.
Murray IJ; Kremers J; Parry NR
Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 18598403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram.
Park JC; Cao D; Collison FT; Fishman GA; McAnany JJ
Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 130(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 25579805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram.
Krishna VR; Alexander KR; Peachey NS
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11784728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of spectral measures of period doubling in the cone flicker electroretinogram.
Alexander KR; Raghuram A; McAnany JJ
Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 117(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 18357480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incremental and decremental L- and M-cone-driven ERG responses: I. Square-wave pulse stimulation.
McKeefry D; Kremers J; Kommanapalli D; Challa NK; Murray IJ; Maguire J; Parry NR
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Apr; 31(4):A159-69. PubMed ID: 24695165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
