687 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27301965)
1. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic Selection Using Extreme Phenotypes and Pre-Selection of SNPs in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
Dong L; Xiao S; Chen J; Wan L; Wang Z
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2016 Oct; 18(5):575-583. PubMed ID: 27704224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-Wide Association Study of Growth and Body-Shape-Related Traits in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea) Using ddRAD Sequencing.
Zhou Z; Han K; Wu Y; Bai H; Ke Q; Pu F; Wang Y; Xu P
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2019 Oct; 21(5):655-670. PubMed ID: 31332575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Moradi MH; IlCho C; Naserkheil M; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 28093066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Constructing a High-Density Genetic Linkage Map for Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea) and Mapping Resistance Trait Against Ciliate Parasite Cryptocaryon irritans.
Kong S; Ke Q; Chen L; Zhou Z; Pu F; Zhao J; Bai H; Peng W; Xu P
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2019 Apr; 21(2):262-275. PubMed ID: 30783862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep.
Bolormaa S; Swan AA; Brown DJ; Hatcher S; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME; Daetwyler HD
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):62. PubMed ID: 28810834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construction of the High-Density Genetic Linkage Map and Chromosome Map of Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
Ao J; Li J; You X; Mu Y; Ding Y; Mao K; Bian C; Mu P; Shi Q; Chen X
Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Nov; 16(11):26237-48. PubMed ID: 26540048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus.
Müller BSF; Neves LG; de Almeida Filho JE; Resende MFR; Muñoz PR; Dos Santos PET; Filho EP; Kirst M; Grattapaglia D
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):524. PubMed ID: 28693539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of gene expression and whole-genome sequence information to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle.
de Las Heras-Saldana S; Lopez BI; Moghaddar N; Park W; Park JE; Chung KY; Lim D; Lee SH; Shin D; van der Werf JHJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Sep; 52(1):54. PubMed ID: 32993481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
