These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27303315)

  • 21. Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models.
    Tan Y; Martin RC; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():198. PubMed ID: 28261133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retrieval and Encoding Interference: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from Anaphor Processing.
    Laurinavichyute A; Jäger LA; Akinina Y; Roß J; Dragoy O
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():965. PubMed ID: 28649216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parsing as a Cue-Based Retrieval Model.
    Dotlačil J
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Aug; 45(8):e13020. PubMed ID: 34379334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1320. PubMed ID: 31244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):407-30. PubMed ID: 17352621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cue-dependent interference in comprehension.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Mem Lang; 2011 Oct; 65(3):247-263. PubMed ID: 21927535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.
    Villata S; Tabor W; Franck J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2. PubMed ID: 29403414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing cataphors: Active antecedent search is persistent.
    Giskes A; Kush D
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1370-1386. PubMed ID: 33974237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pronouns Are as Sensitive to Structural Constraints as Reflexives in Early Processing: Evidence From Visual World Paradigm Eye-Tracking.
    Han CH; Moulton K; Block T; Gendron H; Nederveen S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():611466. PubMed ID: 33613390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interference in the processing of adjunct control.
    Parker D; Lago S; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1346. PubMed ID: 26441723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential effects of constraints in the processing of Russian cataphora.
    Kazanina N; Phillips C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):371-400. PubMed ID: 19585389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Verbal short-term memory capacities and executive function in semantic and syntactic interference resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia.
    Tan Y; Martin RC
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():111-125. PubMed ID: 29524507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processing Control Information in a Nominal Control Construction: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):779-93. PubMed ID: 25980968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attachment and Concord of Temporal Adverbs: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Biondo N; Vespignani F; Dillon B
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():983. PubMed ID: 31214065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.
    Smith G; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Dec; 44(12):e12918. PubMed ID: 33306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Active search for antecedents in cataphoric pronoun resolution.
    Pablos L; Doetjes J; Ruijgrok B; Cheng LL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1638. PubMed ID: 26579023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Computational Evaluation of Sentence Processing Deficits in Aphasia.
    Patil U; Hanne S; Burchert F; De Bleser R; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 40(1):5-50. PubMed ID: 26016698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206616. PubMed ID: 30496297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.