These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27303338)

  • 21. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of "impulsive choice" behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology.
    Ho MY; Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Oct; 146(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 10550487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Queuing theory under competitive social foraging may explain a mathematical equivalence of delay and probability in impulsive decision-making.
    Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):276-9. PubMed ID: 16574335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Four converging measures of temporal discounting and their relationships with intelligence, executive functions, thinking dispositions, and behavioral outcomes.
    Basile AG; Toplak ME
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():728. PubMed ID: 26097462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time discounting and smoking behavior: evidence from a panel survey(*).
    Kang MI; Ikeda S
    Health Econ; 2014 Dec; 23(12):1443-64. PubMed ID: 24136867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Quantized Representation of Intertemporal Choice in the Brain.
    Tee J; Taylor DP
    IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multiscale Commun; 2021 Mar; 7(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 33869666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting.
    Hinvest NS; Anderson IM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jun; 63(6):1072-84. PubMed ID: 19890767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the Appropriate Measure to Estimate Hyperbolic Discounting Rate (
    Berk HR; Gupta TA; Sanabria F
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2021 Dec; 44(4):667-682. PubMed ID: 35098030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future is risky: discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes.
    Blackburn M; El-Deredy W
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():9-18. PubMed ID: 23201372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mixture models of delay discounting and smoking behavior.
    Hofmeyr A; Monterosso J; Dean AC; Morales AM; Bilder RM; Sabb FW; London ED
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2017 May; 43(3):271-280. PubMed ID: 27439543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Being Kind to Your Future Self: Probability Discounting of Health Decision-Making.
    Bruce JM; Bruce AS; Catley D; Lynch S; Goggin K; Reed D; Lim SL; Strober L; Glusman M; Ness AR; Jarmolowicz DP
    Ann Behav Med; 2016 Apr; 50(2):297-309. PubMed ID: 26669602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parabolic discounting of monetary rewards by physical effort.
    Hartmann MN; Hager OM; Tobler PN; Kaiser S
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():192-6. PubMed ID: 24140077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hyperbolic discounting may be reduced to electrical coupling in dopaminergic neural circuits.
    Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 17196757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Weighing outcomes by time or against time? Evaluation rules in intertemporal choice.
    Scholten M; Read D; Sanborn A
    Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 38(3):399-438. PubMed ID: 24404941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes.
    Lawyer SR; Williams SA; Prihodova T; Rollins JD; Lester AC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jul; 84(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 20385215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Probability discounting of treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: associations with disease knowledge, neuropsychiatric status, and adherence.
    Bruce JM; Bruce AS; Lynch S; Thelen J; Lim SL; Smith J; Catley D; Reed DD; Jarmolowicz DP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Nov; 235(11):3303-3313. PubMed ID: 30244284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of multiplicative and additive hyperbolic and hyperboloid discounting models in delayed lotteries involving gains and losses.
    Białaszek W; Marcowski P; Cox DJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233337. PubMed ID: 32442186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The combined effects of delay and probability in discounting.
    Yi R; de la Piedad X; Bickel WK
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16759821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical and cognitive effort discounting across different reward magnitudes: Tests of discounting models.
    Białaszek W; Marcowski P; Ostaszewski P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0182353. PubMed ID: 28759631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of reinforcer magnitude on probability and delay discounting of experienced outcomes in a computer game task in humans.
    Greenhow AK; Hunt MJ; Macaskill AC; Harper DN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.