266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27303957)
1. Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis.
Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Arsenault R; Bae C; Ahn S; Lee J
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7715-22. PubMed ID: 27303957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cradle-to-Gate and Use-Phase Carbon Footprint of a Commercial Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Battery.
Kim HC; Lee S; Wallington TJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Aug; 57(32):11834-11842. PubMed ID: 37515579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries.
Dunn JB; Gaines L; Sullivan J; Wang MQ
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(22):12704-10. PubMed ID: 23075406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life Cycle Assessment of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Sensing and Computing Subsystem and Vehicle Level Effects.
Gawron JH; Keoleian GA; De Kleine RD; Wallington TJ; Kim HC
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 52(5):3249-3256. PubMed ID: 29446302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles.
Notter DA; Gauch M; Widmer R; Wäger P; Stamp A; Zah R; Althaus HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(17):6550-6. PubMed ID: 20695466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the USPS Next-Generation Delivery Vehicle Fleet.
Woody M; Vaishnav P; Craig MT; Keoleian GA
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 56(18):13391-13397. PubMed ID: 36018721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.
Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].
Shi XQ; Sun ZX; Li XN; Li JX; Yang JX
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1105-16. PubMed ID: 25929083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the state of Lithium-Sulphur and lithium-ion batteries applied to electromobility.
Benveniste G; Rallo H; Canals Casals L; Merino A; Amante B
J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 226():1-12. PubMed ID: 30103198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy.
Samaras C; Meisterling K
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3170-6. PubMed ID: 18522090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the European Electric-Mobility Transition: Emissions from Electric Vehicle Manufacturing and Use in Relation to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets.
Tang C; Tukker A; Sprecher B; Mogollón JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 36574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.
Elgowainy A; Han J; Ward J; Joseck F; Gohlke D; Lindauer A; Ramsden T; Biddy M; Alexander M; Barnhart S; Sutherland I; Verduzco L; Wallington TJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):2392-2399. PubMed ID: 29298387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.
Yu Y; Xu H; Cheng J; Wan F; Ju L; Liu Q; Liu J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155626. PubMed ID: 35504393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.
Luk JM; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8215-8228. PubMed ID: 28714678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO₂ Emissions across the United States.
Tamayao MA; Michalek JJ; Hendrickson C; Azevedo IM
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8844-55. PubMed ID: 26125323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Last-Mile Parcel Delivery by Automated Vehicles and Robots.
Li L; He X; Keoleian GA; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; Kemp NJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 34328327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatially-explicit life cycle assessment of sun-to-wheels transportation pathways in the U.S.
Geyer R; Stoms D; Kallaos J
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(2):1170-6. PubMed ID: 23268715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of regional temperature on electric vehicle efficiency, range, and emissions in the United States.
Yuksel T; Michalek JJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3974-80. PubMed ID: 25671586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
