These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The Nuremberg Code 70 Years Later. Moreno JD; Schmidt U; Joffe S JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):795-796. PubMed ID: 28817743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent Requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 29161060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Origins and Drafting of the Beauchamp TL Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(2):240-250. PubMed ID: 33416650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regarding 'Informing consent in New Zealand research: researchers' conflict of interest and patient vulnerability'. Baird MA N Z Med J; 2005 Apr; 118(1212):U1393. PubMed ID: 15806189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues on experiments in anima nobile on hepatitis. Gaze R; Carvalho DM; Tura LF; Silva CC Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 22012278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Children in research. Isaacs D J Paediatr Child Health; 2017 Sep; 53(9):831-832. PubMed ID: 28868774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Georg Büchner's Woyzeck. A tragic example of human experimentation without informed consent. Wolf G Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2004; 67(2):23-8. PubMed ID: 15214239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reality and revisionism: new evidence for Andrew C Ivy's claim to authorship of the Nuremberg Code. Gaw A J R Soc Med; 2014 Apr; 107(4):138-43. PubMed ID: 24566934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuremberg code turns 60. Thieren M; Mauron A Bull World Health Organ; 2007 Aug; 85(8):573. PubMed ID: 17768510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognition of Research Participants' Need for Autonomy: Remembering the Legacy of Henrietta Lacks. Wolinetz CD; Collins FS JAMA; 2020 Sep; 324(11):1027-1028. PubMed ID: 32930765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Divergent standards for consent in research. Nicholson R Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Dec-2004 Jan; (194):13-21. PubMed ID: 15832471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation. Lerner BH N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):1806-7. PubMed ID: 17476006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Rethinking research ethics," again: Casuistry, phronesis, and the continuing challenges of human research. Koski G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):37-9. PubMed ID: 20945265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II. Brody H; Leonard SE; Nie JB; Weindling P Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Apr; 23(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 24534743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]