These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27305316)

  • 1. Appropriate Domain Size for Groundwater Flow Modeling with a Discrete Fracture Network Model.
    Ji SH; Koh YK
    Ground Water; 2017 Jan; 55(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 27305316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FracKfinder: A MATLAB Toolbox for Computing Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Conductivity Tensors for Fractured Porous Media.
    Young NL; Reber JE; Simpkins WW
    Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30381820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Method to Represent a Well in a Three-Dimensional Discrete Fracture Network Model.
    Pham H; Parashar R; Sund N; Pohlmann K
    Ground Water; 2021 Mar; 59(2):281-286. PubMed ID: 32629530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling in-situ transport of uranine and colloids in the fracture network in KURT.
    Kim JW; Lee JK; Baik MH; Jeong J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Feb; 173():59-68. PubMed ID: 25543462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where Does Water Go During Hydraulic Fracturing?
    O'Malley D; Karra S; Currier RP; Makedonska N; Hyman JD; Viswanathan HS
    Ground Water; 2016 Jul; 54(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 26469857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling flow and transport in fracture networks using graphs.
    Karra S; O'Malley D; Hyman JD; Viswanathan HS; Srinivasan G
    Phys Rev E; 2018 Mar; 97(3-1):033304. PubMed ID: 29776097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures.
    Novakowski K; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P; Voralek J; Ross N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):44-60. PubMed ID: 16239047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the Geometry of Connected Fracture Flow with Multiperiod Oscillatory Hydraulic Tests.
    Sayler C; Cardiff M; Fort MD
    Ground Water; 2018 Mar; 56(2):276-287. PubMed ID: 28810071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of Modeling Approaches to Groundwater Flow in Deformed Carbonate Aquifers.
    Medici G; Smeraglia L; Torabi A; Botter C
    Ground Water; 2021 May; 59(3):334-351. PubMed ID: 33368217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of a mesoscale infiltration and water seepage test in unsaturated fractured rock: Spatial variabilities and discrete fracture patterns.
    Zhou Q; Salve R; Liu HH; Wang JS; Hudson D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):96-122. PubMed ID: 16797103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis and Visualization of Discrete Fracture Networks Using a Flow Topology Graph.
    Aldrich G; Hyman JD; Karra S; Gable CW; Makedonska N; Viswanathan H; Woodring J; Hamann B
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2017 Aug; 23(8):1896-1909. PubMed ID: 27333605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graph-based flow modeling approach adapted to multiscale discrete-fracture-network models.
    Doolaeghe D; Davy P; Hyman JD; Darcel C
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Nov; 102(5-1):053312. PubMed ID: 33327073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuum-based DFN-consistent numerical framework for the simulation of oxygen infiltration into fractured crystalline rocks.
    Trinchero P; Puigdomenech I; Molinero J; Ebrahimi H; Gylling B; Svensson U; Bosbach D; Deissmann G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 May; 200():60-69. PubMed ID: 28412014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of pressure change during hydraulic tests on fracture aperture.
    Ji SH; Koh YK; Kuhlman KL; Lee MY; Choi JW
    Ground Water; 2013 Mar; 51(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 22823750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the hydraulic properties of the fracture network in a sandstone aquifer.
    Hitchmough AM; Riley MS; Herbert AW; Tellam JH
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):38-57. PubMed ID: 17346850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical Study on Behavior of Groundwater Flow in Single Rough Fractures Under Mechanical Effect.
    Jeong W
    Ground Water; 2017 Jan; 55(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 27199226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling field-scale multiple tracer injection at a low-level waste disposal site in fractured rocks: effect of multiscale heterogeneity and source term uncertainty on conceptual understanding of mass transfer processes.
    Gwo JP; Jardine PM; Sanford WE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Mar; 77(1-2):91-118. PubMed ID: 15722174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Zhang K; Li H; Achari G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Issues and Options in the Delineation of Well Capture Zones under Uncertainty.
    Frind EO; Molson JW
    Ground Water; 2018 May; 56(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29417996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty analysis of a groundwater flow model in East-central Florida.
    Sepúlveda N; Doherty J
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):464-74. PubMed ID: 25040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.