162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27305670)
1. Prostate Cancer Detection Using Composite Impedance Metric.
Khan S; Mahara A; Hyams ES; Schned AR; Halter RJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2513-2523. PubMed ID: 27305670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of benign and malignant prostatic tissues.
Halter RJ; Schned A; Heaney J; Hartov A; Schutz S; Paulsen KD
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1580-6. PubMed ID: 18295258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the human prostate.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Heaney JA; Paulsen KD; Schned AR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1321-7. PubMed ID: 17605363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Mishra V; Bouayad H; Schned A; Heaney J; Halter RJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():3258-61. PubMed ID: 23366621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.
Murphy EK; Mahara A; Khan S; Hyams ES; Schned AR; Pettus J; Halter RJ
Physiol Meas; 2017 Jun; 38(6):1242-1261. PubMed ID: 28282026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical properties of prostatic tissues: I. Single frequency admittivity properties.
Halter RJ; Schned A; Heaney J; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1600-7. PubMed ID: 19683745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrical properties of prostatic tissues: II. Spectral admittivity properties.
Halter RJ; Schned A; Heaney J; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1608-13. PubMed ID: 19683743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal electrical impedance tomography of the prostate: spatially coregistered pathological findings for prostate cancer detection.
Wan Y; Borsic A; Heaney J; Seigne J; Schned A; Baker M; Wason S; Hartov A; Halter R
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063102. PubMed ID: 23718610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The feasibility of prostate cancer detection by triple spectroscopy.
Salomon G; Hess T; Erbersdobler A; Eichelberg C; Greschner S; Sobchuk AN; Korolik AK; Nemkovich NA; Schreiber J; Herms M; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18359147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical property sensing biopsy needle for prostate cancer detection.
Mishra V; Schned AR; Hartov A; Heaney JA; Seigne J; Halter RJ
Prostate; 2013 Nov; 73(15):1603-13. PubMed ID: 23996675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nuclear Shape and Architecture in Benign Fields Predict Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Findings.
Lee G; Veltri RW; Zhu G; Ali S; Epstein JI; Madabhushi A
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):457-466. PubMed ID: 28753763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atlas of Ex Vivo Prostate Tissue and Cancer Images Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Project for Intraoperative Positive Surgical Margin Detection During Radical Prostatectomy.
Panarello D; Compérat E; Seyde O; Colau A; Terrone C; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):941-958. PubMed ID: 30683530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards intraoperative surgical margin assessment: Validation of an electrical impedance-based probe with ex vivo bovine tissue.
Doussan AF; Lloyd S; Murphy EK; Halter RJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic and least squares algorithms for estimating spectral EIS parameters of prostatic tissues.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD; Schned A; Heaney J
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S111-23. PubMed ID: 18544804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A high accuracy broadband measurement system for time resolved complex bioimpedance measurements.
Kaufmann S; Malhotra A; Ardelt G; Ryschka M
Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1163-80. PubMed ID: 24845882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioimpedance: novel use of a minimally invasive technique for cancer localization in the intact prostate.
Lee BR; Roberts WW; Smith DG; Ko HW; Epstein JI; Lecksell K; Partin AW
Prostate; 1999 May; 39(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 10334111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Light Reflectance Spectroscopy to Detect Positive Surgical Margins on Prostate Cancer Specimens.
Morgan MS; Lay AH; Wang X; Kapur P; Ozayar A; Sayah M; Zeng L; Liu H; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 26410735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2001 Jun; 165(6 Pt 1):1943-8; discussion 1948-9. PubMed ID: 11371886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
