These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27309385)

  • 1. An Examination of Adolescent Recall of Anti-Smoking Messages: Attitudes, Message Type, and Message Perceptions.
    Bigsby E; Monahan JL; Ewoldsen DR
    Health Commun; 2017 Apr; 32(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 27309385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements.
    Jung WS; Villegas J
    Health Mark Q; 2011; 28(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 21815740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. College students' perspective on smoking cessation: "If the message doesn't speak to me, I don't hear it".
    Staten RR; Ridner SL
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Jan; 28(1):101-15. PubMed ID: 17130010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How neuroticism affects responses to anti-smoking messages.
    Bates CE; Monahan JL; Rhodes N
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 22007935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of framing and fear on ratings and impact of antimarijuana PSAs.
    Zimmerman RS; Cupp PK; Abadi M; Donohew RL; Gray C; Gordon L; Grossl AB
    Subst Use Misuse; 2014 Jun; 49(7):824-35. PubMed ID: 24502372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 20390667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages.
    Moorman M; van den Putte B
    Addict Behav; 2008 Oct; 33(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 18584971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smoke-Free Policies in Multiunit Housing: Smoking Behavior and Reactions to Messaging Strategies in Support or in Opposition.
    Berg CJ; Haardörfer R; Windle M; Solomon M; Kegler MC
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E98. PubMed ID: 26111158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: a theoretical approach.
    Grandpre J; Alvaro EM; Burgoon M; Miller CH; Hall JR
    Health Commun; 2003; 15(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 12788679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tobacco industry manipulation messages in anti-smoking public service announcements: the effect of explicitly versus implicitly delivering messages.
    Shadel WG; Fryer CS; Tharp-Taylor S
    Addict Behav; 2010 May; 35(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 20071100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions about cigarette smoking and risks among college students.
    Murphy-Hoefer R; Alder S; Higbee C
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2004 Dec; 6 Suppl 3():S371-4. PubMed ID: 15799600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing the effectiveness of antismoking messages via self-congruent appeals.
    Chang C
    Health Commun; 2009 Jan; 24(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19204856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of bundled health messages on recall.
    Whitehill King K; Freimuth V; Lee M; Johnson-Turbes CA
    Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(3 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 23286660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncovering the most effective active ingredients of antismoking public service announcements: the role of actor and message characteristics.
    Shadel WG; Fryer CS; Tharp-Taylor S
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 May; 11(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 19372574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2011; 26(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 21409669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of celebrity exemplars on college students' smoking.
    Yoo W
    J Am Coll Health; 2016; 64(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 26495934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does changing the order of threat and efficacy information influence the persuasiveness of threat messages?
    Hall S; Bishop AJ; Marteau TM
    Br J Health Psychol; 2006 May; 11(Pt 2):333-43. PubMed ID: 16643703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.
    Lee S; Cappella JN; Lerman C; Strasser AA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Apr; 13(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 21330273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeting anti-smoking messages: does audience race matter?
    Tharp-Taylor S; Fryer CS; Shadel WG
    Addict Behav; 2012 Jul; 37(7):844-7. PubMed ID: 22481049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smoking Is So Ew!: College Smokers' Reactions to Health- Versus Social-Focused Antismoking Threat Messages.
    Wong NC; Nisbett GS; Harvell LA
    Health Commun; 2017 Apr; 32(4):451-460. PubMed ID: 27314311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.