These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27310727)

  • 1. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
    Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term and long-term test-retest reliability of the Nasality Severity Index 2.0.
    Bettens K; Wuyts FL; D'haeseleer E; Luyten A; Meerschman I; Van Crayelynghe C; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():1-11. PubMed ID: 27175827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores.
    Bettens K; Bruneel L; Maryn Y; De Bodt M; Luyten A; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 76():11-20. PubMed ID: 30071470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The nasality severity index: an objective measure of hypernasality based on a multiparameter approach. A pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17172784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults.
    Bettens K; Wuyts FL; Jonckheere L; Platbrood S; Van Lierde K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Oct; 42(3):133-140. PubMed ID: 27841710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Nasality Severity Index 2.0: Revision of an Objective Multiparametric Approach to Hypernasality.
    Bettens K; Van Lierde KM; Corthals P; Luyten A; Wuyts FL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e60-70. PubMed ID: 25794017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Sweeney T; Sell D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.
    Prado-Oliveira R; Marques IL; Souza Ld; Souza-Brosco TV; Dutka Jde C
    Codas; 2015; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25885197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of vowel type on reliability of nasality ratings.
    Watterson T; Lewis K; Allord M; Sulprizio S; O'Neill P
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(6):503-12. PubMed ID: 17391692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scaling for Assessment of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Baylis A; Chapman K; Whitehill TL;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 25322442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of inter-judge agreement on perceptual judgment of nasality.
    Scarmagnani RH; Oliveira AC; Fukushiro AP; Salgado MH; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2014; 26(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 25388067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age and gender in normal-speaking children on the nasality severity index: an objective multiparametric approach to hypernasality.
    Bettens K; Wuyts FL; De Graef C; Verhegge L; Van Lierde KM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 24356338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between velopharyngeal closure, hypernasality, nasal air emission and nasal rustle in subjects with repaired cleft palate.
    Scarmagnani RH; Barbosa DA; Fukushiro AP; Salgado MH; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2015; 27(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 26222944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual Judgments of Resonance, Nasal Airflow, Understandability, and Acceptability in Speakers With Cleft Palate: Ordinal Versus Visual Analogue Scaling.
    Castick S; Knight RA; Sell D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jan; 54(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 28067575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasalance during use of pharyngeal and glottal place of production.
    Garcia AF; Marino VC; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Guerra TA; Lauris JR; Dutka Jde C
    Codas; 2014; 26(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 25388073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.