These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27311578)

  • 1. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are participants' reports of their own reaction times reliable? Re-examining introspective limitations in active and passive dual-task paradigms.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():1-9. PubMed ID: 27825020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are introspective reaction times affected by the method of time estimation? A comparison of visual analogue scales and reproduction.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):978-84. PubMed ID: 25487868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.
    Bratzke D; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective estimates of total processing time in dual-tasking: (some) good news for bad introspection.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jul; 87(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 36367568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The surprising role of stimulus modality in the dual-task introspective blind spot: a memory account.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1332-1354. PubMed ID: 34255135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.
    Marti S; Sigman M; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2883-98. PubMed ID: 21988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multitasking and aging: do older adults benefit from performing a highly practiced task?
    Allen PA; Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Voss A
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):280-307. PubMed ID: 24785592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
    Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distorted subjective reports of stimulus onsets under dual-task conditions: Delayed conscious perception or estimation bias?
    Bratzke D; Bryce D; Seifried-Dübon T
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Nov; 30():36-47. PubMed ID: 25137569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck.
    Corallo G; Sackur J; Dehaene S; Sigman M
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1110-7. PubMed ID: 19076482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.