These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27312597)

  • 1. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 54(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 10721236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework.
    Baucum M; John R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():90-103. PubMed ID: 29627061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural awareness mitigates the effect of delay in human causal learning.
    Greville WJ; Cassar AA; Johansen MK; Buehner MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):904-16. PubMed ID: 23580340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human judgments of positive and negative causal chains.
    Baetu I; Baker AG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 19364225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The causal structure of utility conditionals.
    Bonnefon JF; Sloman SA
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(1):193-209. PubMed ID: 23163750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choosing optimal causal backgrounds for causal discovery.
    Barberia I; Baetu I; Sansa J; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2413-31. PubMed ID: 20521215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The environmental malleability of base-rate neglect.
    Turpin MH; Meyers EA; Walker AC; Białek M; Stolz JA; Fugelsang JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 32043220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. There aren't plenty more fish in the sea: a causal network approach.
    Nikolic M; Lagnado DA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Nov; 106(4):564-82. PubMed ID: 25597224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transitive reasoning distorts induction in causal chains.
    von Sydow M; Hagmayer Y; Meder B
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):469-87. PubMed ID: 26620811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.