These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27312597)

  • 21. Transitive reasoning distorts induction in causal chains.
    von Sydow M; Hagmayer Y; Meder B
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):469-87. PubMed ID: 26620811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.
    White PA
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causal Networks or Causal Islands? The Representation of Mechanisms and the Transitivity of Causal Judgment.
    Johnson SG; Ahn WK
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Sep; 39(7):1468-503. PubMed ID: 25556901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1083-102. PubMed ID: 11009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural correlates of causal power judgments.
    Cummins DD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():1014. PubMed ID: 25566033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Encouraging children to think counterfactually enhances blocking in a causal learning task.
    McCormack T; Simms V; McGourty J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1910-26. PubMed ID: 23425340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causing time: Evaluating causal changes to the when rather than the whether of an outcome.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):200-211. PubMed ID: 32034691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individuals Who Believe in the Paranormal Expose Themselves to Biased Information and Develop More Causal Illusions than Nonbelievers in the Laboratory.
    Blanco F; Barberia I; Matute H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131378. PubMed ID: 26177025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coincidence judgment in causal reasoning: How coincidental is this?
    Johansen MK; Osman M
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101290. PubMed ID: 32200045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
    Macho S; Burkart J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal predictability enhances judgements of causality in elemental causal induction from both observation and intervention.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):678-97. PubMed ID: 25996899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-construal and the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Grimm LR; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18035631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.